Paper · 2004 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Effect of Insecticidal Spray Schedules on Sucking Pests of American Cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.*

P. Ulaganathan; G.P. Gupta

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field trails were conducted to evaluate the bio-efficacy of insecticidal spray schedules against sucking pests, viz. jassids, whitefly, thrips and aphids. Results showed that the spray schedule incorporated with six rounds of new synthetic insecticide molecules (Acetamiprid, imidacloprid, betacyfluthrin, spinosad, bifenthrin/indoxacarb and lambdacyhalothrin) was effective in reducing jassid, whitefly and thrips populaitons, however, it was not effective against aphids, rather resulted in its severe build-up. Unilateral application of ten to eleven rounds of synthetic insecticides was effective against jassid and thrips only. Insecticidal mixtures were effective against whitefly at its peak population but could not continue for long run. Repeated application of neem was found effective against sucking pests, however alternate spray of neem and Bt failed to control any of these pests.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six-round synthetic insecticide schedule reduced jassid populations.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
six rounds of new synthetic insecticide moleculese0
Interactor
jasside0pest
Outcome
jasside0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spray schedule incorporated with six rounds of new synthetic insecticide molecules (Acetamiprid, imidacloprid, betacyfluthrin, spinosad, bifenthrin/indoxacarb and lambdacyhalothrin) was effective in reducing jassid, whitefly and thrips populaitons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six-round schedule reduced whitefly populations.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
six rounds of new synthetic insecticide moleculese0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whiteflye0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spray schedule incorporated with six rounds of new synthetic insecticide molecules (Acetamiprid, imidacloprid, betacyfluthrin, spinosad, bifenthrin/indoxacarb and lambdacyhalothrin) was effective in reducing jassid, whitefly and thrips populaitons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six-round schedule reduced thrips populations.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
six rounds of new synthetic insecticide moleculese0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
thripse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spray schedule incorporated with six rounds of new synthetic insecticide molecules (Acetamiprid, imidacloprid, betacyfluthrin, spinosad, bifenthrin/indoxacarb and lambdacyhalothrin) was effective in reducing jassid, whitefly and thrips populaitons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The six-round schedule caused severe aphid buildup.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
six roundse1
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
aphidse0
Direction
severe build-upe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was not effective against aphids, rather resulted in its severe build-up”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“the spray schedule incorporated with six rounds of new synthetic insecticide molecules (Acetamiprid, imidacloprid, betacyfluthrin, spinosad, bifenthrin/indoxacarb and lambdacyhalothrin) was effective in reducing jassid, whitefly and thrips populaitons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten to eleven synthetic insecticide rounds controlled jassid and thrips only.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
ten to eleven rounds of synthetic insecticidese0
Interactor
jasside0pest
Second interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
jassid and thripse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Unilateral application of ten to eleven rounds of synthetic insecticides was effective against jassid and thrips only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticidal mixtures controlled whitefly at peak population but lacked sustained control.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Insecticidal mixturese0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whiteflye0
Qualifier
could not continue for long rune0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insecticidal mixtures were effective against whitefly at its peak population but could not continue for long run.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated neem application was effective against sucking pests.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Repeated application of neeme0
Interactor
sucking pestse0pest
Outcome
sucking pestse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Repeated application of neem was found effective against sucking pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate neem and Bt sprays failed to control any sucking pests.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
alternate spray of neem and Bte0
Interactor
sucking pestse1peste0
Outcome
these pestse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alternate spray of neem and Bt failed to control any of these pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“Repeated application of neem was found effective against sucking pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–817 · show in text ↑

insecticide · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

76 papers: 51 positive, 25 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

insecticide · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

botanical · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

transgenic · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 31 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

application · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 36 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.