Paper · 2001 · Acta agriculturae Serbica

The effect of mineral and biological nitrogen on microbiological traits of smonitza and maize yield

Leka G. Mandić; Dragutin Đukić; M. Govedarica

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

The paper presents the study on the effect of inoculation of maize seed (NSSC-640) by asymbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria (Azotobacter chroococcum strain 84) and increasing rates of mineral nitrogen on quantitative composition of microorganisms (total number of bacteria, number of actionomycetes and azotobacter) in smonitza under maize and on the yield of the grown crop. The following fertilization treatments were studied: N1PK (90:75:60 kgha-1); N2PK (120:75:60 kgha-1); N3PK (150:75:60 kgha-1), as well as the treatment with presowing inoculation of maize seed. Microbiological analysis included the assessment of total number of microorganisms actinomycetes and azotobacters in the rhizosphere and edaphosphere during maize vegetation. Total numbers of microorganisms were determined by growth on the medium for the total number with an appropriate amount (0.5 ml) of 10-6 soil dilution, numbers of actinomycetes - by growing on synthetic agar according to Krasil'nikov with 10-4 of soil dilution and azotobacters - by growing on Fyodorov's agar with 10-2 of soil dilution. The study results showed that the numbers of microorganism groups were affected by the type and rate of fertilizers applied, as well as by the time and sampling zone. The application of Azotobacter chroococcum, strain 84, resulted in an increase of the total numbers of microorganisms, actinomycetes and azotobacters especially in the rhizosphere soil at the onset, and even in the middle of maize vegetation. Lower rates of nitrogen fertilizers (90 and 120 kgha-1) led to a significant increase of total bacteria numbers, as well as an insignificant change in azotobacter numbers, whereas their high rate (150 kgha-1) had a depressive effect on the mentioned microorganisms, paricularly in the edaphosphere of maize. In contrast, actinomycete numbers were not reduced even with this nitrogen treatment. Under the studied agroecological conditions, the highest maize yield, but not economically justified one, was obtained with the highest nitrogen rate. Seed inoculation with Azotobacter chroococcum, strain 84, caused an insignificant rise in maize yield, which can be associated with acid reaction of the soil studied and slower release of nitrogen accumulated in their cells.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microorganism group counts varied with fertilizer type and rate, time, and sampling zone.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
type and rate of fertilizers appliede0
Outcome
numbers of microorganism groupse0
Qualifier
time and sampling zonee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“numbers of microorganism groups were affected by the type and rate of fertilizers applied, as well as by the time and sampling zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter chroococcum strain 84 increased total microorganisms, actinomycetes and azotobacters, especially in rhizosphere soil early and mid maize vegetation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
application of Azotobacter chroococcum, strain 84e0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcum, strain 84Azotobacter chroococcume0symbiont
Outcome
total numbers of microorganisms, actinomycetes and azotobacterse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
rhizosphere soil at the onset, and even in the middle of maize vegetatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of Azotobacter chroococcum, strain 84, resulted in an increase of the total numbers of microorganisms, actinomycetes and azotobacters especially in the rhizosphere soil at the onset, and even in the middle of maize vegetation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rates of 90 and 120 kgha-1 significantly increased total bacteria numbers.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Lower rates of nitrogen fertilizers (90 and 120 kgha-1)e0
Outcome
total bacteria numberse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower rates of nitrogen fertilizers (90 and 120 kgha-1) led to a significant increase of total bacteria numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rates of 90 and 120 kgha-1 caused an insignificant change in azotobacter numbers.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Lower rates of nitrogen fertilizers (90 and 120 kgha-1)e0
Outcome
azotobacter numberse0
Direction
changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower rates of nitrogen fertilizers (90 and 120 kgha-1) led to a significant increase of total bacteria numbers, as well as an insignificant change in azotobacter numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1661 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 kgha-1 nitrogen rate depressed the mentioned microorganisms, especially in maize edaphosphere.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
high rate (150 kgha-1)e0
Outcome
mentioned microorganismse0
Direction
depressivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their high rate (150 kgha-1) had a depressive effect on the mentioned microorganisms, paricularly in the edaphosphere of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinomycete numbers were not reduced at the high nitrogen rate.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
this nitrogen treatmente0
Outcome
actinomycete numberse0
Direction
not reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“actinomycete numbers were not reduced even with this nitrogen treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–1883 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest nitrogen rate gave the highest maize yield, but was not economically justified.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
highest nitrogen ratee0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
not economically justifiede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest maize yield, but not economically justified one, was obtained with the highest nitrogen rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1930–2034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with Azotobacter chroococcum strain 84 insignificantly raised maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Seed inoculation with Azotobacter chroococcum, strain 84e0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcum, strain 84Azotobacter chroococcume0symbiont
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
risee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed inoculation with Azotobacter chroococcum, strain 84, caused an insignificant rise in maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2036–2137 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter chroococcum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.