Paper · 2012 · eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)

Micro-basin technology in Ethiopia - is it worth the effort?

T Mesfin; Carina Moeller; Floris van Ogtrop

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Micro-basin technologies such as tied-ridge tillage have been proposed as a means to lessen effects of high rainfall variability on crop yields. Relationships between three seasonal climate variables and maize/sorghum yields and two tillage systems were examined for a semi-arid environment in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. The average yield (pooled data) was significantly higher with tied-ridge tillage compared to traditional tillage (3099 vs. 2669 kg/ha). The number of dry spells was the most important predictor for crop yield in either tillage system while total seasonal rainfall was the weakest predictor. The linear yield response to the climate variables was the same in either tillage system: yields increased by 1.85 kg/ha per mm rainfall, and decreased by 81 kg/ha for each dry spell and by 216 kg/ha for each additional dry spell event ≥ 7 days. Thus, there was no differential performance of tillage systems depending on seasonal conditions. Overall, tied-ridge tillage could be a means to improve productivity in the study environment if management-related system constraints (e.g. nutrient supply, residue management) are adequately addressed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tied-ridge tillage raised pooled crop yield relative to traditional tillage.

Taxon
maize/sorghumSorghumZea mayse1
Treatment
tied-ridge tillagee0
Outcome
average yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
3099 vs. 2669 kg/hae0
Comparator
traditional tillagee0
Setting
Central Rift Valley of Ethiopiae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average yield (pooled data) was significantly higher with tied-ridge tillage compared to traditional tillage (3099 vs. 2669 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–466 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize/sorghum yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–224 · show in text ↑
e2

“Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–329 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry-spell count was the strongest yield predictor.

Taxon
maize/sorghumSorghumZea mayse1
Outcome
crop yielde0
Qualifier
number of dry spells was the most important predictore0
Setting
either tillage systeme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of dry spells was the most important predictor for crop yield in either tillage system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–564 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize/sorghum yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–224 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total seasonal rainfall was the weakest yield predictor.

Taxon
maize/sorghumSorghumZea mayse1
Outcome
weakest predictore0
Qualifier
total seasonal rainfalle0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total seasonal rainfall was the weakest predictor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–620 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize/sorghum yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–224 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increased by 1.85 kg/ha per millimeter of rainfall.

Taxon
maize/sorghumSorghumZea mayse1
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.85 kg/ha per mm rainfalle0
Qualifier
rainfalle0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yields increased by 1.85 kg/ha per mm rainfall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–758 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize/sorghum yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–224 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield decreased by 81 kg/ha for each dry spell.

Taxon
maize/sorghumSorghumZea mayse1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
decreasede0
Value
81 kg/hae0
Qualifier
each dry spelle0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased by 81 kg/ha for each dry spell”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–804 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize/sorghum yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–224 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield decreased by 216 kg/ha for each additional dry spell of at least seven days.

Taxon
maize/sorghumSorghumZea mayse2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
decreasede1
Value
216 kg/hae0
Qualifier
each additional dry spell event ≥ 7 dayse0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by 216 kg/ha for each additional dry spell event ≥ 7 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–866 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreased by 81 kg/ha for each dry spell”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–804 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize/sorghum yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–224 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Climate yield responses were the same in both tillage systems.

Taxon
maize/sorghumSorghumZea mayse1
Outcome
linear yield response to the climate variablese0
Direction
samee0
Comparator
either tillage systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The linear yield response to the climate variables was the same in either tillage system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–710 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize/sorghum yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–224 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Tied ridges could improve productivity if management constraints are addressed.

Taxon
maize/sorghumSorghumZea mayse1
Outcome
improve productivitye0
Qualifier
if management-related system constraints (e.g. nutrient supply, residue management) are adequately addressede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tied-ridge tillage could be a means to improve productivity in the study environment if management-related system constraints (e.g. nutrient supply, residue management) are adequately addressed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1168 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize/sorghum yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–224 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.