Paper · 2009 · ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice

Integrated nutrient management for rice–rice cropping system

Hirak Banerjee; Sanjit Kumar Pal

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Integrated nutrient management for rice (Oryza sativa L.) – rice cropping system in the subhumid subtropical climatic condition was studied at Regional Research Sub-Station (RRS), Chakdaha, Nadia, West Bengal. Considering the system productivity, economics of production and soil fertility condition it may be concluded that maximum production (9.26 and 10.37 t ha−1yr−1 under HYV-HYV and hybrid-hybrid crop sequences, respectively) was obtained when rice crop received 50% recommended doses of nutrients through chemical fertilizer along with 50% recommended doses of nutrients through green leaf manuring during wet season and 100% recommended doses of nutrients through chemical fertilizer during boro season. Under the same treatment combination the net returns/annum were Rs. 24939.25 and Rs. 25875.59 ha−1yr−1 and the returns rupee−1investment were Rs. 1.66 and Rs. 1.62 in HYV-HYV and hybrid-hybrid rice crop sequences, respectively. Under similar conditions soil N, P and K content improved over initial value by 1–17%, 1– 5% and 0 –6%, respectively under hybrid rice-hybrid rice crop sequence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nutrient regime produced maximum HYV-HYV production of 9.26 t ha−1yr−1.

Material
HYV-HYVe0
Treatment
50% recommended doses of nutrients through chemical fertilizer along with 50% recommended doses of nutrients through green leaf manuring during wet season and 100% recommended doses of nutrients through chemical fertilizer during boro seasone0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
9.26 and 10.37 t ha−1yr−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum production (9.26 and 10.37 t ha−1yr−1 under HYV-HYV and hybrid-hybrid crop sequences, respectively) was obtained when rice crop received 50% recommended doses of nutrients through chemical fertilizer along with 50% recommended doses of nutrients through green leaf manuring during wet season and 100% recommended doses of nutrients through chemical fertilizer during boro season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nutrient regime produced maximum hybrid-hybrid production of 10.37 t ha−1yr−1.

Material
hybrid-hybride0
Treatment
50% recommended doses of nutrients through chemical fertilizer along with 50% recommended doses of nutrients through green leaf manuring during wet season and 100% recommended doses of nutrients through chemical fertilizer during boro seasone0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
9.26 and 10.37 t ha−1yr−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum production (9.26 and 10.37 t ha−1yr−1 under HYV-HYV and hybrid-hybrid crop sequences, respectively) was obtained when rice crop received 50% recommended doses of nutrients through chemical fertilizer along with 50% recommended doses of nutrients through green leaf manuring during wet season and 100% recommended doses of nutrients through chemical fertilizer during boro season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–711 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HYV-HYV net returns were Rs. 24939.25 ha−1yr−1.

Material
HYV-HYVe0
Outcome
net returns/annume0
Value
Rs. 24939.25 and Rs. 25875.59 ha−1yr−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the same treatment combination the net returns/annum were Rs. 24939.25 and Rs. 25875.59 ha−1yr−1 and the returns rupee−1investment were Rs. 1.66 and Rs. 1.62 in HYV-HYV and hybrid-hybrid rice crop sequences, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–939 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid-hybrid net returns were Rs. 25875.59 ha−1yr−1.

Material
hybrid-hybride0
Outcome
net returns/annume0
Value
Rs. 24939.25 and Rs. 25875.59 ha−1yr−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the same treatment combination the net returns/annum were Rs. 24939.25 and Rs. 25875.59 ha−1yr−1 and the returns rupee−1investment were Rs. 1.66 and Rs. 1.62 in HYV-HYV and hybrid-hybrid rice crop sequences, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–939 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HYV-HYV returned Rs. 1.66 per rupee invested.

Material
HYV-HYVe0
Outcome
returns rupee−1investmente0
Value
Rs. 1.66 and Rs. 1.62e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“returns rupee−1investment were Rs. 1.66 and Rs. 1.62 in HYV-HYV and hybrid-hybrid rice crop sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–925 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid-hybrid returned Rs. 1.62 per rupee invested.

Material
hybrid-hybride0
Outcome
returns rupee−1investmente0
Value
Rs. 1.66 and Rs. 1.62e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“returns rupee−1investment were Rs. 1.66 and Rs. 1.62 in HYV-HYV and hybrid-hybrid rice crop sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–925 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil N rose by 1–17% over initial value in the hybrid sequence.

Material
hybrid rice-hybrid ricee0
Outcome
soil Ne0
Direction
improvede0
Value
1–17%e0
Comparator
initial valuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil N, P and K content improved over initial value by 1–17%, 1– 5% and 0 –6%, respectively under hybrid rice-hybrid rice crop sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P rose by 1–5% over initial value in the hybrid sequence.

Material
hybrid rice-hybrid ricee0
Outcome
soil N, P and K contente0
Direction
improvede0
Value
1– 5%e0
Comparator
initial valuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil N, P and K content improved over initial value by 1–17%, 1– 5% and 0 –6%, respectively under hybrid rice-hybrid rice crop sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil K rose by 0–6% over initial value in the hybrid sequence.

Material
hybrid rice-hybrid ricee0
Outcome
soil N, P and K contente0
Direction
improvede0
Value
0 –6%e0
Comparator
initial valuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil N, P and K content improved over initial value by 1–17%, 1– 5% and 0 –6%, respectively under hybrid rice-hybrid rice crop sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1101 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

62 papers: 53 positive, 9 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

climate site · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

172 papers: 110 positive, 62 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

168 papers more in this group

See all 172 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.