Paper · 2002 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Weed Management Studies in Maize Based Intercropping Systems

C. L. Deshveer; Amar Singh

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif seasons of 1998 and 1999 at Agricultural Research Station, Kumher, Bharatpur, Rajasthan to assess the efficacy of herbicides in different maize based intercropping systems. Repeated hand weeding proved most effective in reducing weed growth and in increasing crop production. Pre-planting application of fluchloralin at 0.75 kg ha−1 was at par with hand weeding. The maximum maize equivalent (4250 kg ha−1) was obtained due to fluchloralin with planting geometry of maize paired row+blackgram in 2: 2 ratio. Intercropping systems reduced the weed biomass. The lowest weed density was recorded in paired row planting in 2: 3 and 2: 2 (maize+blackgram) intercropping system. Maize paired row+blackgram in 2: 2 ratio in combination with fluchloralin at 0.75 kg ha−1 was found to be the most economical.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated hand weeding was most effective in reducing weed growth in maize-based intercropping.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Repeated hand weedinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Repeated hand weeding proved most effective in reducing weed growth and in increasing crop production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated hand weeding was most effective in increasing crop production in maize-based intercropping.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Repeated hand weedinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
crop productione0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Repeated hand weeding proved most effective in reducing weed growth and in increasing crop production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-planting application of fluchloralin at 0.75 kg ha−1 was at par with hand weeding.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Pre-planting application of fluchloralin at 0.75 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
at pare0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
hand weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pre-planting application of fluchloralin at 0.75 kg ha−1 was at par with hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum maize equivalent yield of 4250 kg ha−1 was obtained with fluchloralin and paired row maize+blackgram planting in a 2:2 ratio.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
fluchloralin with planting geometry of maize paired row+blackgram in 2: 2 ratioe0
Outcome
maize equivalente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4250 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum maize equivalent (4250 kg ha−1) was obtained due to fluchloralin with planting geometry of maize paired row+blackgram in 2: 2 ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping systems reduced weed biomass.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Intercropping systemse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercropping systems reduced the weed biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest weed density was recorded in paired row planting at 2:3 and 2:2 in the maize+blackgram intercropping system.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
paired row planting in 2: 3 and 2: 2 (maize+blackgram) intercropping systeme0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest weed density was recorded in paired row planting in 2: 3 and 2: 2 (maize+blackgram) intercropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize paired row+blackgram in 2:2 ratio with fluchloralin at 0.75 kg ha−1 was the most economical.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Maize paired row+blackgram in 2: 2 ratio in combination with fluchloralin at 0.75 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
most economicale0
Direction
most economicale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maize paired row+blackgram in 2: 2 ratio in combination with fluchloralin at 0.75 kg ha−1 was found to be the most economical”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–845 · show in text ↑

intercropping · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 71 positive, 8 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.