Paper · 2002 · Weed Technology

Effect of Postemergence Application Rate and Timing of Mesotrione on Corn (Zea mays) Response and Weed Control1

BRADLEY C. JOHNSON; BRYAN G. YOUNG; JOSEPH L. MATTHEWS

16
claims
30
verbatim quotes
82
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1999 and 2000 to determine the influence of mesotrione postemergence application rate, application timing, and addition of atrazine on corn injury, weed control, and corn grain yield. Corn injury in the form of leaf bleaching ranged from 0 to 15% at 7 d after treatment (DAT). In general, most of the bleaching injury rapidly dissipated with slight (≤ 8%) to no corn injury observed at 28 DAT. Control of common cocklebur with mesotrione at 14 DAT ranged from 79 to 98% for all treatments over both years. Applying mesotrione at 140 g/ha, at the early postemergence (EPOST) timing, or in combination with atrazine provided the greatest control of common cocklebur at 14 DAT. Application rate of mesotrione was the only factor that was significant in both years for control of common cocklebur later in the season at 56 DAT. Control of ivyleaf morningglory with mesostrione at 14 DAT ranged from 60 to 90% for all treatments in both years. Control of ivyleaf morningglory at 14 DAT was enhanced by the addition of atrazine to mesotrione. Control of ivyleaf morningglory at 56 DAT was greater with mid-postemergence and late postemergence than with EPOST applications, and was generally enhanced by the addition of atrazine. Yellow nutsedge control with mesotrione was inconsistent, ranging from 40 to 87% at 14 DAT for all treatments over both years. The addition of atrazine to mesotrione increased yellow nutsedge control from 47 to 87% at 14 DAT in 2000. Increasing the rate of mesotrione from 70 to 140 g/ha, as well as the addition of atrazine, improved control of yellow nutsedge at 56 DAT. Corn grain yield was not affected by corn injury or weed control as there were no significant differences in grain yield between herbicide-treated plots and handweeded plots.Nomenclature: Atrazine; mesotrione; common cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. #3 XANST; ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea L. Jacq. # IPOHE; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES; corn Zea mays L. ‘DK 592SR’, ‘DK 683SR’.Abbreviations: COC, crop-oil concentrate; DAT, days after treatment; EPOST, early postemergence; MPOST, mid-postemergence; LPOST, late postemergence; PRE, preemergence; UAN, 28% urea ammonium nitrate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn leaf bleaching injury ranged from 0 to 15% seven days after treatment.

Outcome
Corn injury in the form of leaf bleachinge0
Value
0 to 15%e0
Qualifier
7 d after treatment (DAT)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn injury in the form of leaf bleaching ranged from 0 to 15% at 7 d after treatment (DAT).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–312 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn bleaching injury mostly dissipated by 28 days, when injury was slight or absent.

Outcome
bleaching injurye0
Direction
rapidly dissipatede0
Value
≤ 8%e0
Qualifier
28 DATe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most of the bleaching injury rapidly dissipated with slight (≤ 8%) to no corn injury observed at 28 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–429 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common cocklebur control by mesotrione was 79 to 98% at 14 days across treatments and years.

Treatment
mesotrionee0
Interactor
common cocklebure0weed
Outcome
Control of common cocklebure0
Value
79 to 98%e0
Qualifier
14 DATe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of common cocklebur with mesotrione at 14 DAT ranged from 79 to 98% for all treatments over both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesotrione at 140 g/ha gave the greatest common cocklebur control at 14 days.

Treatment
mesotrione at 140 g/hae0
Interactor
common cocklebure0weed
Outcome
control of common cocklebure0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
14 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying mesotrione at 140 g/ha, at the early postemergence (EPOST) timing, or in combination with atrazine provided the greatest control of common cocklebur at 14 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early postemergence mesotrione gave the greatest common cocklebur control at 14 days.

Treatment
early postemergence (EPOST) timinge0
Interactor
common cocklebure0weed
Outcome
control of common cocklebure0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
14 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying mesotrione at 140 g/ha, at the early postemergence (EPOST) timing, or in combination with atrazine provided the greatest control of common cocklebur at 14 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining mesotrione with atrazine gave the greatest common cocklebur control at 14 days.

Treatment
in combination with atrazinee0
Interactor
common cocklebure0weed
Outcome
control of common cocklebure0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
14 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying mesotrione at 140 g/ha, at the early postemergence (EPOST) timing, or in combination with atrazine provided the greatest control of common cocklebur at 14 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesotrione rate was the only factor significant for common cocklebur control at 56 days in both years.

Treatment
Application rate of mesotrionee0
Interactor
common cocklebure0weed
Outcome
control of common cocklebure0
Qualifier
56 DATe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application rate of mesotrione was the only factor that was significant in both years for control of common cocklebur later in the season at 56 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ivyleaf morningglory control with mesotrione ranged from 60 to 90% at 14 days.

Interactor
ivyleaf morninggloryIpomoea hederaceae0weed
Outcome
Control of ivyleaf morningglorye0
Value
60 to 90%e0
Qualifier
14 DATe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ipomoea hederacea
Ipomoea hederacea · InteractorUser:SB_Johnny · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of ivyleaf morningglory with mesostrione at 14 DAT ranged from 60 to 90% for all treatments in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding atrazine to mesotrione enhanced ivyleaf morningglory control at 14 days.

Treatment
addition of atrazine to mesotrionee0
Interactor
ivyleaf morninggloryIpomoea hederaceae0weed
Outcome
Control of ivyleaf morningglorye0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
14 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ipomoea hederacea
Ipomoea hederacea · InteractorUser:SB_Johnny · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of ivyleaf morningglory at 14 DAT was enhanced by the addition of atrazine to mesotrione.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-postemergence and late postemergence applications controlled ivyleaf morningglory better than early applications at 56 days.

Treatment
mid-postemergence and late postemergencee0
Interactor
ivyleaf morninggloryIpomoea hederaceae0weed
Outcome
Control of ivyleaf morningglorye0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
56 DATe0
Comparator
EPOST applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ipomoea hederacea
Ipomoea hederacea · InteractorUser:SB_Johnny · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of ivyleaf morningglory at 56 DAT was greater with mid-postemergence and late postemergence than with EPOST applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine generally enhanced ivyleaf morningglory control at 56 days.

Treatment
addition of atrazinee0
Interactor
ivyleaf morninggloryIpomoea hederaceae0weed
Outcome
Control of ivyleaf morningglorye0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
56 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ipomoea hederacea
Ipomoea hederacea · InteractorUser:SB_Johnny · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of ivyleaf morningglory at 56 DAT was greater with mid-postemergence and late postemergence than with EPOST applications, and was generally enhanced by the addition of atrazine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow nutsedge control with mesotrione was inconsistent, ranging from 40 to 87% at 14 days.

Interactor
Yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
Yellow nutsedge controle0
Value
40 to 87%e0
Qualifier
14 DATe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yellow nutsedge control with mesotrione was inconsistent, ranging from 40 to 87% at 14 DAT for all treatments over both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding atrazine to mesotrione raised yellow nutsedge control from 47 to 87% at 14 days in 2000.

Treatment
addition of atrazine to mesotrionee0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
yellow nutsedge controle0
Direction
increasede0
Value
87%e0
Qualifier
from 47 to 87% at 14 DAT in 2000e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of atrazine to mesotrione increased yellow nutsedge control from 47 to 87% at 14 DAT in 2000.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing mesotrione from 70 to 140 g/ha improved yellow nutsedge control at 56 days.

Treatment
mesotrione from 70 to 140 g/hae0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
control of yellow nutsedgee0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
56 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the rate of mesotrione from 70 to 140 g/ha, as well as the addition of atrazine, improved control of yellow nutsedge at 56 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding atrazine improved yellow nutsedge control at 56 days.

Treatment
addition of atrazinee0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
control of yellow nutsedgee0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
56 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the rate of mesotrione from 70 to 140 g/ha, as well as the addition of atrazine, improved control of yellow nutsedge at 56 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide-treated plots had no significant corn grain yield difference from handweeded plots.

Treatment
herbicide-treated plotse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
handweeded plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn grain yield was not affected by corn injury or weed control as there were no significant differences in grain yield between herbicide-treated plots and handweeded plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1806 · show in text ↑

atrazine · Ipomoea hederacea · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mesotrione · Ipomoea hederacea · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
    The mesotrione mix with glyphosate-TMS or paraquat controlled ivyleaf morningglory at least as well as the reference mix.

    Mesotrione Combinations in No-Till Corn (Zea mays)1 · 2003 · compared with prepackage mixture of the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate (glyphosate-IPA) plus atrazine plus acetochlor

    Same direction

See all 3 papers →

mesotrione · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

atrazine · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 69 positive, 17 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

herbicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 94 positive, 25 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 500 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.