Paper · 2009 · Weed Technology

Evaluation of S-Metolachlor and S-Metolachlor Plus Atrazine Mixtures with Mesotrione for Broadleaf Weed Control in Corn

Cory M. Whaley; Gregory R. Armel; Henry P. Wilson; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 2001, 2002, and 2003 to evaluate PRE applications of mesotrione at 150, 230, and 310 g ai/ha alone, and in mixtures with S -metolachlor at 1,070 g ai/ha and atrazine at 560 and 1,120 g ai/ha in corn. Corn injury was 11 to 18% with all treatments in 2002 when 3.2 cm of rainfall occurred within 10 d after PRE applications, but no injury was observed in 2001 and 2003 when rainfall was 0 and 1.1 cm within 10 d after PRE applications, respectively. Rainfall following PRE herbicide applications also influenced weed control, where weed control was generally poor with all herbicide treatments in 2001. Mesotrione at 150 g/ha controlled common lambsquarters and smooth pigweed at least 95% in 2002 and 2003, but control was 70% or less in 2001. PRE mesotrione at rates of 230 or 310 g/ha controlled common ragweed at least 83% in 2002 and 2003, but control exceeded 88% with mixtures of mesotrione at rates greater than 150 g/ha plus S -metolachlor plus atrazine at 560 g/ha. Morningglory species (ivyleaf morningglory, pitted morningglory, and tall morningglory) were not consistently controlled by mesotrione alone. In 2002 and 2003, mixtures of all mesotrione rates plus S -metolachlor plus atrazine at 1,120 g/ha controlled morningglory species at least 90%. Corn treated with mesotrione at any rate plus S -metolachlor plus atrazine at 1,120 g/ha consistently produced high yields. It is concluded that control with this three-way mixture would be most consistent with a minimum rate of mesotrione at 230 g/ha and atrazine at 1,120 g/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicide treatments caused 11 to 18% corn injury in rainy 2002, with none observed in 2001 or 2003.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
Corn injurye0
Value
11 to 18%e0
Qualifier
2002 when 3.2 cm of rainfall occurred within 10 d after PRE applicationse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn injury was 11 to 18% with all treatments in 2002 when 3.2 cm of rainfall occurred within 10 d after PRE applications, but no injury was observed in 2001 and 2003 when rainfall was 0 and 1.1 cm within 10 d after PRE applications, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–483 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control was generally poor with all herbicides in 2001.

Treatment
all herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
poore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rainfall following PRE herbicide applications also influenced weed control, where weed control was generally poor with all herbicide treatments in 2001.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesotrione at 150 g/ha controlled common lambsquarters and smooth pigweed at least 95% in 2002 and 2003.

Treatment
Mesotrione at 150 g/hae0
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
controllede0
Direction
controllede0
Value
95%e0
Qualifier
in 2002 and 2003e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mesotrione at 150 g/ha controlled common lambsquarters and smooth pigweed at least 95% in 2002 and 2003, but control was 70% or less in 2001.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesotrione at 150 g/ha controlled smooth pigweed at least 95% in 2002 and 2003.

Treatment
Mesotrione at 150 g/hae0
Interactor
smooth pigweedAmaranthus hybriduse0weed
Outcome
controllede0
Direction
controllede0
Value
95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus hybridus
Amaranthus hybridus · InteractorUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mesotrione at 150 g/ha controlled common lambsquarters and smooth pigweed at least 95% in 2002 and 2003, but control was 70% or less in 2001.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control by mesotrione at 150 g/ha was 70% or less in 2001.

Treatment
Mesotrione at 150 g/hae0
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
controle0
Value
70% or lesse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mesotrione at 150 g/ha controlled common lambsquarters and smooth pigweed at least 95% in 2002 and 2003, but control was 70% or less in 2001.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesotrione at 230 or 310 g/ha controlled common ragweed at least 83% in 2002 and 2003.

Treatment
PRE mesotrione at rates of 230 or 310 g/hae0
Interactor
common ragweedAmbrosia artemisiifoliae0weed
Outcome
controllede0
Direction
controllede0
Value
83%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ambrosia artemisiifolia
Ambrosia artemisiifolia · InteractorDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PRE mesotrione at rates of 230 or 310 g/ha controlled common ragweed at least 83% in 2002 and 2003, but control exceeded 88% with mixtures of mesotrione at rates greater than 150 g/ha plus S -metolachlor plus atrazine at 560 g/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-way mixture controlled common ragweed above 88%.

Treatment
mesotrione at rates greater than 150 g/ha plus S -metolachlor plus atrazine at 560 g/hae0
Interactor
common ragweedAmbrosia artemisiifoliae1weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
88%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ambrosia artemisiifolia
Ambrosia artemisiifolia · InteractorDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control exceeded 88% with mixtures of mesotrione at rates greater than 150 g/ha plus S -metolachlor plus atrazine at 560 g/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1009 · show in text ↑
e1

“common ragweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesotrione alone did not consistently control morningglory species.

Treatment
mesotrione alonee0
Interactor
ivyleaf morninggloryIpomoea hederaceae0weed
Outcome
Morningglory speciese0
Direction
not consistently controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ipomoea hederacea
Ipomoea hederacea · InteractorUser:SB_Johnny · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Morningglory species (ivyleaf morningglory, pitted morningglory, and tall morningglory) were not consistently controlled by mesotrione alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-way mixture controlled morningglory species at least 90% in 2002 and 2003.

Treatment
mixtures of all mesotrione rates plus S -metolachlor plus atrazine at 1,120 g/hae0
Interactor
morningglory speciese0weed
Outcome
controlled morningglory speciese0
Direction
controllede0
Value
90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2002 and 2003, mixtures of all mesotrione rates plus S -metolachlor plus atrazine at 1,120 g/ha controlled morningglory species at least 90%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1296 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn given any mesotrione rate plus metolachlor and atrazine at 1,120 g/ha consistently had high yield.

Treatment
mesotrione at any rate plus S -metolachlor plus atrazine at 1,120 g/hae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn treated with mesotrione at any rate plus S -metolachlor plus atrazine at 1,120 g/ha consistently produced high yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1420 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend at least 230 g/ha mesotrione and 1,120 g/ha atrazine in the three-way mixture for consistent control.

Treatment
mesotrione at 230 g/ha and atrazine at 1,120 g/hae0
Outcome
control with this three-way mixture would be most consistente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is concluded that control with this three-way mixture would be most consistent with a minimum rate of mesotrione at 230 g/ha and atrazine at 1,120 g/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1576 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–119 · show in text ↑

metolachlor · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

mesotrione · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

29 papers: 21 positive, 8 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

mesotrione · Ipomoea hederacea · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    The mesotrione mix with glyphosate-TMS or paraquat controlled ivyleaf morningglory at least as well as the reference mix.

    Mesotrione Combinations in No-Till Corn (Zea mays)1 · 2003 · compared with prepackage mixture of the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate (glyphosate-IPA) plus atrazine plus acetochlor

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mesotrione · Ambrosia artemisiifolia · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mesotrione · Chenopodium album · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

atrazine · Ambrosia artemisiifolia · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

metolachlor · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 24 positive, 3 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.