Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mesotrione at postemergence rates up to 150 g AI ha-1 selectively controlled triazine resistant Chenopodium album.

A claim from Activity of mesotrione on resistant weeds in maize · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesotrione at postemergence rates up to 150 g AI ha-1 selectively controlled triazine resistant Chenopodium album.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
150 g AI ha-1 or less, mesotrionee0
Interactor
Chenopodium album LChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
control of key speciese0
Direction
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At post-emergence rates of 150 g AI ha-1 or less, mesotrione provides naturally selective control of key species that may show triazine resistance (TR), e.g. Chenopodium album L, Amaranthus species, Solanum nigrum L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–602
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50

Title

Activity of mesotrione on resistant weeds in maize

Peter Sutton; Claire Richards; Larry Buren; et al. Pest Management Science 2002. doi:10.1002/ps.554

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-005a419c6aff97b920062594156be0b221b9a516094843b7ed50e74045f9c0a1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

mesotrione · Chenopodium album · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Synergism between mesotrione and bromoxynil was not observed for common lambsquarters control in corn at Urbana in 2008 at the lower herbicide rates.

    Broadleaf Weed Management in Corn Utilizing Synergistic Postemergence Herbicide Combinations · 2009

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Mesotrione at 150 g/ha controlled common lambsquarters and smooth pigweed at least 95% in 2002 and 2003.

    Evaluation of S-Metolachlor and S-Metolachlor Plus Atrazine Mixtures with Mesotrione for Broadleaf Weed Control in Corn · 2009

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. negative
    Mesotrione plus acetochlor did not adequately control common lambsquarters.

    Mesotrione, Acetochlor, and Atrazine for Weed Management in Corn (Zea mays)1 · 2003

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    PRE mesotrione controlled common lambsquarters at least 80%.

    Mesotrione Combinations in No-Till Corn (Zea mays)1 · 2003

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Mesotrione alone controlled common lambsquarters 93 to 99%.

    Mesotrione Alone and in Mixtures with Glyphosate in Glyphosate-Resistant Corn (Zea mays)1 · 2003

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Mesotrione mixtures controlled common lambsquarters better.

    Use of Mixtures of Mesotrione, Imazethapyr, and Imazethapyr plus Imazapyr in Imidazolinone-Resistant Corn (Zea mays)1 · 2003 · compared with imazethapyr or imazethapyr plus imazapyr alone

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Mesotrione controlled common lambsquarters by 95%.

    Comparison of Pyroxasulfone, S‐metolachlor, and Mesotrione for Weed Control in Sweet Corn on Organic Soils · 2013

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Pyroxasulfone + encapsulated saflufenacil with dicamba or mesotrione + atrazine improved common lambsquarters and redroot pigweed control at 8 WAE compared with the mixture applied alone.

    Efficacy of pyroxasulfone + encapsulated saflufenacil applied preemergence with partner herbicides for weed control in corn · 2025 · compared with pyroxasulfone + encapsulated saflufenacil applied alone

    Same direction

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.