Paper · 2013 · Crop Management

Comparison of Pyroxasulfone, S‐metolachlor, and Mesotrione for Weed Control in Sweet Corn on Organic Soils

Dennis C. Odero; Alan L. Wright

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at the Everglades Research and Education Center in Belle Glade, FL, during 2011 and 2012 to evaluate weed control and sweet corn response to preemergence application of pyroxasulfone, S-metolachlor, and mesotrione on high organic matter soils (up to 85%) of the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) in southern Florida. Pyroxasulfone (0.21 and 0.43 lb a.i./acre) controlled spiny amaranth, common lambsquarters, and common purslane 91 to 100, 95 to 100, and 94 to 99% at 49 days after treatment (DAT), respectively. S-metolachlor (2.48 and 4.97 lb a.i./acre) controlled these respective weeds 98 to 99, 17 to 42, and 70 to 80%. Mesotrione (0.19 lb a.i./acre) at this timing controlled spiny amaranth, common lambsquarters, and common purslane 78, 95, and 24%, respectively. No above ground visible injury of sweet corn was observed irrespective of herbicide or rate. Overall, pyroxasulfone resulted in higher sweet corn yield compared to S-metolachlor and mesotrione. The results of this study show that preemergence pyroxasulfone can provide effective residual control of problematic broadleaf weeds that is more consistent than S-metolachlor or mesotrione in sweet corn on high organic matter soils of the EAA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxasulfone controlled spiny amaranth by 91 to 100% at 49 days after treatment.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
Pyroxasulfone (0.21 and 0.43 lb a.i./acre)e1
Interactor
spiny amaranthe1weed
Outcome
spiny amaranthe1
Direction
controllede1
Value
91 to 100e1
Qualifier
at 49 days after treatment (DAT)e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate weed control and sweet corn response to preemergence application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pyroxasulfone (0.21 and 0.43 lb a.i./acre) controlled spiny amaranth, common lambsquarters, and common purslane 91 to 100, 95 to 100, and 94 to 99% at 49 days after treatment (DAT), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxasulfone controlled common lambsquarters by 95 to 100% at 49 days after treatment.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
Pyroxasulfone (0.21 and 0.43 lb a.i./acre)e1
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume1weed
Outcome
common lambsquarterse1
Direction
controllede1
Value
95 to 100e1
Qualifier
at 49 days after treatment (DAT)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate weed control and sweet corn response to preemergence application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pyroxasulfone (0.21 and 0.43 lb a.i./acre) controlled spiny amaranth, common lambsquarters, and common purslane 91 to 100, 95 to 100, and 94 to 99% at 49 days after treatment (DAT), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxasulfone controlled common purslane by 94 to 99% at 49 days after treatment.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
Pyroxasulfone (0.21 and 0.43 lb a.i./acre)e1
Interactor
common purslanee1weed
Outcome
common purslanee1
Direction
controllede1
Value
94 to 99e1
Qualifier
at 49 days after treatment (DAT)e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate weed control and sweet corn response to preemergence application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pyroxasulfone (0.21 and 0.43 lb a.i./acre) controlled spiny amaranth, common lambsquarters, and common purslane 91 to 100, 95 to 100, and 94 to 99% at 49 days after treatment (DAT), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-metolachlor controlled spiny amaranth by 98 to 99%.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
S-metolachlor (2.48 and 4.97 lb a.i./acre)e2
Interactor
spiny amaranthe1weed
Outcome
spiny amaranthe1
Direction
controllede2
Value
98 to 99e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate weed control and sweet corn response to preemergence application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pyroxasulfone (0.21 and 0.43 lb a.i./acre) controlled spiny amaranth, common lambsquarters, and common purslane 91 to 100, 95 to 100, and 94 to 99% at 49 days after treatment (DAT), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–545 · show in text ↑
e2

“S-metolachlor (2.48 and 4.97 lb a.i./acre) controlled these respective weeds 98 to 99, 17 to 42, and 70 to 80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-metolachlor controlled common lambsquarters by 17 to 42%.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
S-metolachlor (2.48 and 4.97 lb a.i./acre)e2
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume1weed
Outcome
common lambsquarterse1
Direction
controllede2
Value
17 to 42e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate weed control and sweet corn response to preemergence application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pyroxasulfone (0.21 and 0.43 lb a.i./acre) controlled spiny amaranth, common lambsquarters, and common purslane 91 to 100, 95 to 100, and 94 to 99% at 49 days after treatment (DAT), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–545 · show in text ↑
e2

“S-metolachlor (2.48 and 4.97 lb a.i./acre) controlled these respective weeds 98 to 99, 17 to 42, and 70 to 80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-metolachlor controlled common purslane by 70 to 80%.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
S-metolachlor (2.48 and 4.97 lb a.i./acre)e2
Interactor
common purslanee1weed
Outcome
common purslanee1
Direction
controllede2
Value
70 to 80e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate weed control and sweet corn response to preemergence application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pyroxasulfone (0.21 and 0.43 lb a.i./acre) controlled spiny amaranth, common lambsquarters, and common purslane 91 to 100, 95 to 100, and 94 to 99% at 49 days after treatment (DAT), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–545 · show in text ↑
e2

“S-metolachlor (2.48 and 4.97 lb a.i./acre) controlled these respective weeds 98 to 99, 17 to 42, and 70 to 80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesotrione controlled spiny amaranth by 78%.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
Mesotrione (0.19 lb a.i./acre)e3
Interactor
spiny amaranthe3weed
Outcome
spiny amaranthe3
Direction
controllede3
Value
78e3
Qualifier
at this timinge3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate weed control and sweet corn response to preemergence application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–198 · show in text ↑
e3

“Mesotrione (0.19 lb a.i./acre) at this timing controlled spiny amaranth, common lambsquarters, and common purslane 78, 95, and 24%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesotrione controlled common lambsquarters by 95%.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
Mesotrione (0.19 lb a.i./acre)e3
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume3weed
Outcome
common lambsquarterse3
Direction
controllede3
Value
95e3
Qualifier
at this timinge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate weed control and sweet corn response to preemergence application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–198 · show in text ↑
e3

“Mesotrione (0.19 lb a.i./acre) at this timing controlled spiny amaranth, common lambsquarters, and common purslane 78, 95, and 24%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesotrione controlled common purslane by 24%.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
Mesotrione (0.19 lb a.i./acre)e3
Interactor
common purslanee3weed
Outcome
common purslanee3
Direction
controllede3
Value
24e3
Qualifier
at this timinge3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate weed control and sweet corn response to preemergence application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–198 · show in text ↑
e3

“Mesotrione (0.19 lb a.i./acre) at this timing controlled spiny amaranth, common lambsquarters, and common purslane 78, 95, and 24%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No above-ground visible injury of sweet corn was observed irrespective of herbicide or rate.

Taxon
sweet corne4
Treatment
herbicide or ratee4
Outcome
above ground visible injurye4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e4

“No above ground visible injury of sweet corn was observed irrespective of herbicide or rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxasulfone gave higher sweet corn yield than S-metolachlor and mesotrione.

Taxon
sweet corne5
Treatment
pyroxasulfonee5
Outcome
sweet corn yielde5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
S-metolachlor and mesotrionee5

Verbatim

e5

“Overall, pyroxasulfone resulted in higher sweet corn yield compared to S-metolachlor and mesotrione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence pyroxasulfone gives more consistent residual control of problematic broadleaf weeds than S-metolachlor or mesotrione.

Taxon
sweet corne6
Treatment
preemergence pyroxasulfonee6
Outcome
effective residual control of problematic broadleaf weedse6
Direction
more consistente6
Comparator
S-metolachlor or mesotrionee6

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate weed control and sweet corn response to preemergence application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–198 · show in text ↑
e6

“The results of this study show that preemergence pyroxasulfone can provide effective residual control of problematic broadleaf weeds that is more consistent than S-metolachlor or mesotrione in sweet corn on high organic matter soils of the EAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1242 · show in text ↑

mesotrione · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mesotrione · Chenopodium album · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

pyroxasulfone · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

pyroxasulfone · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pyroxasulfone · Chenopodium album · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pyroxasulfone · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 26 positive, 35 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.