Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mesotrione controlled spiny amaranth by 78%.

A claim from Comparison of Pyroxasulfone, S‐metolachlor, and Mesotrione for Weed Control in Sweet Corn on Organic Soils · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesotrione controlled spiny amaranth by 78%.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
Mesotrione (0.19 lb a.i./acre)e3
Interactor
spiny amaranthe3weed
Outcome
spiny amaranthe3
Direction
controllede3
Value
78e3
Qualifier
at this timinge3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate weed control and sweet corn response to preemergence application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–198
e3

“Mesotrione (0.19 lb a.i./acre) at this timing controlled spiny amaranth, common lambsquarters, and common purslane 78, 95, and 24%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–803

Title

Comparison of Pyroxasulfone, S‐metolachlor, and Mesotrione for Weed Control in Sweet Corn on Organic Soils

Dennis C. Odero; Alan L. Wright Crop Management 2013. doi:10.1094/cm-2013-0227-01-rs

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-96fef2ceb13b43dbb8b727d58d7964ef9e2c76131e434f0018c3071572df9bf4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

mesotrione · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.