Paper · 2015 · Weed Technology

Tank Mixing Pendimethalin with Pyroxasulfone and Chloroacetamide Herbicides Enhances In-Season Residual Weed Control in Corn

Prashant Jha; Vipan Kumar; Josefina Garcia; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Kochia, common lambsquarters, and wild buckwheat are major problem weeds in glyphosate-resistant corn production in the northern Great Plains of the United States. Field research was conducted in 2011 and 2012 near Huntley, MT to investigate effective PRE herbicides applied alone or in premixes with or without tank-mixed pendimethalin for extended in-season residual control of the selected broadleaf weeds in glyphosate-resistant corn. Control of kochia, common lambsquarters, and wild buckwheat with recently registered herbicide premixes, including saflufenacil + dimethenamid-P and S -metolachlor + mesotrione, was as high as 95 and 90% at 21 and 63 d after treatment (DAT), and mostly similar to the standard atrazine treatment. Residual control of common lambsquarters and wild buckwheat from pyroxasulfone was higher at 298 compared with 149 g ai ha −1 rate. Pyroxasulfone and other chloroacetamide herbicides (acetochlor or dimethenamid-P) applied alone failed to provide greater than 79, 70, and 54% residual control at 21, 35, and 63 DAT, respectively, of the weed species investigated. Residual weed control throughout the growing season was significantly improved with the addition of pendimethalin to pyroxasulfone (149 g ha −1 ), acetochlor, or dimethenamid-P when compared with any of the three herbicides applied alone. Kochia control by pyroxasulfone, acetochlor, or dimethenamid-P tank mixed with pendimethalin was as high as 94, 92, and 81% at 21, 35, and 63 DAT, respectively. Control of common lambsquarters with the addition of pendimethalin to pyroxasulfone or acetochlor was improved to 94, 89, and 81% at 21, 35, and 63 DAT, respectively. Similarly, wild buckwheat control with acetochlor plus pendimethalin was improved to 87, 85, and 82% at 21, 35, and 63 DAT, respectively. Consistent with the extended in-season (up to 9 wk) residual weed control, pyroxasulfone, acetochlor, or dimethenamid-P treatments when tank mixed with pendimethalin had higher corn yields compared with the herbicides applied alone. The investigation on residual herbicides that provide extended in-season weed control should be continued as an important aspect of glyphosate stewardship and to mitigate the occurrence of glyphosate-resistant weed populations in grower fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recently registered herbicide premixes controlled kochia, common lambsquarters and wild buckwheat as high as 95 and 90%, mostly similar to atrazine.

Treatment
recently registered herbicide premixese1
Interactor
kochiaBassiae1weed
Second interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume1weed
Outcome
Control of kochia, common lambsquarters, and wild buckwheate1
Direction
mostly similare2
Value
95 and 90%e2
Comparator
standard atrazine treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bassia
Bassia · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Felagund · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · Second interactorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major problem weeds in glyphosate-resistant corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control of kochia, common lambsquarters, and wild buckwheat with recently registered herbicide premixes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–542 · show in text ↑
e2

“was as high as 95 and 90% at 21 and 63 d after treatment (DAT), and mostly similar to the standard atrazine treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxasulfone residual control of common lambsquarters and wild buckwheat was higher at 298 than at 149 g ai ha −1.

Treatment
pyroxasulfonee1
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume1weed
Second interactor
wild buckwheatFallopia convolvuluse1weed
Outcome
Residual controle1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
149 g ai ha −1 ratee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fallopia convolvulus
Fallopia convolvulus · Second interactorAung · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major problem weeds in glyphosate-resistant corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“Residual control of common lambsquarters and wild buckwheat from pyroxasulfone was higher at 298 compared with 149 g ai ha −1 rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxasulfone and other chloroacetamide herbicides applied alone failed to provide residual control greater than 79, 70 and 54%.

Treatment
Pyroxasulfone and other chloroacetamide herbicidese2
Interactor
weed speciese2weed
Outcome
residual controle2
Direction
failed to provide greater thane2
Value
79, 70, and 54%e2
Qualifier
applied alonee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major problem weeds in glyphosate-resistant corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pyroxasulfone and other chloroacetamide herbicides (acetochlor or dimethenamid-P) applied alone failed to provide greater than 79, 70, and 54% residual control at 21, 35, and 63 DAT, respectively, of the weed species investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1097 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding pendimethalin to pyroxasulfone, acetochlor or dimethenamid-P significantly improved residual weed control compared with those herbicides alone.

Treatment
addition of pendimethaline3
Outcome
Residual weed controle3
Direction
improvede3
Qualifier
throughout the growing seasone3
Comparator
any of the three herbicides applied alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major problem weeds in glyphosate-resistant corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–112 · show in text ↑
e3

“Residual weed control throughout the growing season was significantly improved with the addition of pendimethalin to pyroxasulfone (149 g ha −1 ), acetochlor, or dimethenamid-P when compared with any of the three herbicides applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kochia control by pyroxasulfone, acetochlor or dimethenamid-P tank mixed with pendimethalin was as high as 94, 92 and 81% at 21, 35 and 63 DAT.

Treatment
tank mixed with pendimethaline4
Interactor
KochiaBassiae4weed
Outcome
Kochia controle4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
94, 92, and 81%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bassia
Bassia · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Felagund · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major problem weeds in glyphosate-resistant corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–112 · show in text ↑
e4

“Kochia control by pyroxasulfone, acetochlor, or dimethenamid-P tank mixed with pendimethalin was as high as 94, 92, and 81% at 21, 35, and 63 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding pendimethalin to pyroxasulfone or acetochlor improved common lambsquarters control to 94, 89 and 81%.

Treatment
addition of pendimethalin to pyroxasulfone or acetochlore5
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume5weed
Outcome
Control of common lambsquarterse5
Direction
improvede5
Value
94, 89, and 81%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major problem weeds in glyphosate-resistant corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–112 · show in text ↑
e5

“Control of common lambsquarters with the addition of pendimethalin to pyroxasulfone or acetochlor was improved to 94, 89, and 81% at 21, 35, and 63 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetochlor plus pendimethalin improved wild buckwheat control to 87, 85 and 82%.

Treatment
acetochlor plus pendimethaline6
Interactor
wild buckwheatFallopia convolvuluse6weed
Outcome
wild buckwheat controle6
Direction
improvede6
Value
87, 85, and 82%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fallopia convolvulus
Fallopia convolvulus · InteractorAung · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major problem weeds in glyphosate-resistant corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–112 · show in text ↑
e6

“wild buckwheat control with acetochlor plus pendimethalin was improved to 87, 85, and 82% at 21, 35, and 63 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides tank mixed with pendimethalin had higher corn yields than herbicides applied alone.

Treatment
tank mixed with pendimethaline0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the herbicides applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pyroxasulfone, acetochlor, or dimethenamid-P treatments when tank mixed with pendimethalin had higher corn yields compared with the herbicides applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1879–2035 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

54 papers: 52 positive, 2 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

2-chloroacetamide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

acetochlor · Chenopodium album · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

pyroxasulfone · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

pyroxasulfone · Chenopodium album · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · Bassia · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

herbicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 94 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.