Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Adding pendimethalin to pyroxasulfone, acetochlor or dimethenamid-P significantly improved residual weed control compared with those herbicides alone.

A claim from Tank Mixing Pendimethalin with Pyroxasulfone and Chloroacetamide Herbicides Enhances In-Season Residual Weed Control in Corn · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding pendimethalin to pyroxasulfone, acetochlor or dimethenamid-P significantly improved residual weed control compared with those herbicides alone.

Treatment
addition of pendimethaline3
Outcome
Residual weed controle3
Direction
improvede3
Qualifier
throughout the growing seasone3
Comparator
any of the three herbicides applied alonee3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major problem weeds in glyphosate-resistant corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–112
e3

“Residual weed control throughout the growing season was significantly improved with the addition of pendimethalin to pyroxasulfone (149 g ha −1 ), acetochlor, or dimethenamid-P when compared with any of the three herbicides applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1336

Title

Tank Mixing Pendimethalin with Pyroxasulfone and Chloroacetamide Herbicides Enhances In-Season Residual Weed Control in Corn

Prashant Jha; Vipan Kumar; Josefina Garcia; et al. Weed Technology 2015. doi:10.1614/wt-d-14-00095.1

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-0b7b9196e093e7d7e7770cfde2b28bff0af2aff3dfd7cb5cc70720ea82ac3ce2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

pendimethalin · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.