Paper · 2006 · Weed Technology

Weed Control in Glyphosate-Resistant Corn as Affected by Preemergence Herbicide and Timing of Postemergence Herbicide Application

Robert G. Parker; Alan C. York; David L. Jordan

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted at three locations during both 2002 and 2003 to evaluate weed control and response of glyphosate-resistant (GR) corn to glyphosate or nicosulfuron plus atrazine applied POST at three application timings with and without alachlor plus atrazine applied PRE. The POST herbicides were applied timely (5- to 9-cm weeds) or applications were delayed 1 or 2 wk. All treatments, except the weedy check, were followed by glyphosate postemergence-directed (PDIR) 4 wk after the timely POST application. Common lambsquarters, common ragweed, Palmer amaranth, prickly sida, and smooth pigweed were controlled at least 94% regardless of PRE or POST treatments. Large crabgrass and fall panicum were controlled at least 96% by glyphosate regardless of PRE herbicide or POST application timing. In contrast, control by nicosulfuron plus atrazine POST in the absence of PRE herbicide decreased as application was delayed. Sicklepod was controlled at least 94% when POST herbicides were applied timely, but control by both POST herbicide treatments decreased with delayed application regardless of PRE herbicide. Tall morningglory was controlled 93% or greater by POST herbicides applied timely. Control by both POST herbicide treatments decreased as application was delayed, with glyphosate being affected more by timing than nicosulfuron plus atrazine. Corn grain yield was similar with glyphosate and nicosulfuron plus atrazine. Yield was unaffected by POST application timing when PRE herbicides were included. Without PRE herbicide, grain yield decreased as POST herbicide application was delayed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five broadleaf weeds were controlled at least 94% across treatments.

Treatment
PRE or POST treatmentse0
Interactor
Common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
Common lambsquarters, common ragweed, Palmer amaranth, prickly sida, and smooth pigweed were controllede0
Direction
controllede0
Value
at least 94%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Common lambsquarters, common ragweed, Palmer amaranth, prickly sida, and smooth pigweed were controlled at least 94% regardless of PRE or POST treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glyphosate-Resistant Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate controlled large crabgrass and fall panicum at least 96% irrespective of PRE herbicide or POST timing.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Interactor
Large crabgrasse0weed
Outcome
Large crabgrass and fall panicum were controllede0
Direction
controllede0
Value
at least 96%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Large crabgrass and fall panicum were controlled at least 96% by glyphosate regardless of PRE herbicide or POST application timing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glyphosate-Resistant Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without PRE herbicide, delayed nicosulfuron plus atrazine POST reduced weed control.

Treatment
nicosulfuron plus atrazine POSTe0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
application was delayede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control by nicosulfuron plus atrazine POST in the absence of PRE herbicide decreased as application was delayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glyphosate-Resistant Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timely POST herbicide application controlled sicklepod at least 94%.

Treatment
POST herbicidese0
Interactor
Sicklepode0weed
Outcome
Sicklepod was controllede0
Direction
controllede0
Value
at least 94%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sicklepod was controlled at least 94% when POST herbicides were applied timely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glyphosate-Resistant Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed application reduced sicklepod control by both POST herbicides regardless of PRE herbicide.

Treatment
delayed applicatione0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
regardless of PRE herbicidee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control by both POST herbicide treatments decreased with delayed application regardless of PRE herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glyphosate-Resistant Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timely POST herbicides controlled tall morningglory at least 93%.

Treatment
POST herbicides applied timelye0
Interactor
Tall morningglorye0weed
Outcome
Tall morningglory was controllede0
Direction
controllede0
Value
93% or greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tall morningglory was controlled 93% or greater by POST herbicides applied timely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glyphosate-Resistant Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed POST application reduced tall morningglory control, more for glyphosate than nicosulfuron plus atrazine.

Treatment
application was delayede0
Outcome
Controle0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
nicosulfuron plus atrazinee0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control by both POST herbicide treatments decreased as application was delayed, with glyphosate being affected more by timing than nicosulfuron plus atrazine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glyphosate-Resistant Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield was similar under glyphosate and nicosulfuron plus atrazine.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
nicosulfuron plus atrazinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn grain yield was similar with glyphosate and nicosulfuron plus atrazine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With PRE herbicide, POST application timing did not affect yield.

Treatment
POST application timinge0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
unaffectede0
Qualifier
when PRE herbicides were includede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield was unaffected by POST application timing when PRE herbicides were included”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glyphosate-Resistant Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without PRE herbicide, delayed POST application decreased grain yield.

Treatment
POST herbicide application was delayede0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
Without PRE herbicidee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Without PRE herbicide, grain yield decreased as POST herbicide application was delayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glyphosate-Resistant Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–41 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

77 papers: 42 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

nicosulfuron · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

glyphosate · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 36 positive, 5 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

atrazine · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 69 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

herbicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 94 positive, 25 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 500 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.