Paper · 2003 · Weed Technology

Effect of Postemergence Glyphosate Application Timing on Weed Control and Grain Yield in Glyphosate-Resistant Corn: Results of a 2-Yr Multistate Study1

STEVEN A. GOWER; MARK M. LOUX; JOHN CARDINA; et al.

17
claims
23
verbatim quotes
57
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted at 35 sites throughout the north-central United States in 1998 and 1999 to determine the effect of postemergence glyphosate application timing on weed control and grain yield in glyphosate-resistant corn. Glyphosate was applied at various timings based on the height of the most dominant weed species. Weed control and corn grain yields were considerably more variable when glyphosate was applied only once. The most effective and consistent season-long annual grass and broadleaf weed control occurred when a single glyphosate application was delayed until weeds were 15 cm or taller. Two glyphosate applications provided more consistent weed control when weeds were 10 cm tall or less and higher corn grain yields when weeds were 5 cm tall or less, compared with a single application. Weed control averaged at least 94 and 97% across all sites in 1998 and 1999, respectively, with two glyphosate applications but was occasionally less than 70% because of late emergence of annual grass and Amaranthus spp. or reduced control of Ipomoea spp. With a single application of glyphosate, corn grain yield was most often reduced when the application was delayed until weeds were 23 cm or taller. Averaged across all sites in 1998 and 1999, corn grain yields from a single glyphosate application at the 5-, 10-, 15-, 23-, and 30-cm timings were 93, 94, 93, 91, and 79% of the weed-free control, respectively. There was a significant effect of herbicide treatment on corn grain yield in 23 of the 35 sites when weed reinfestation was prevented with a second glyphosate application. When weed reinfestation was prevented, corn grain yield at the 5-, 10-, and 15-cm application timings was 101, 97, and 93% of the weed-free control, respectively, averaged across all sites. Results of this study suggested that the optimum timing for initial glyphosate application to avoid corn grain yield loss was when weeds were less than 10 cm in height, no more than 23 d after corn planting, and when corn growth was not more advanced than the V4 stage.Nomenclature: Glyphosate; Amaranthus spp. #3 AMASS; Ipomoea spp. # IPOSS; corn, Zea mays L. ‘Roundup Ready®’ # SETFA.Additional index words: Herbicide-resistant crops, weed interference.Abbreviation: POST, postemergence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control and corn grain yields were more variable when glyphosate was applied only once.

Treatment
glyphosate was applied only oncee0
Outcome
Weed control and corn grain yieldse0
Direction
more variablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control and corn grain yields were considerably more variable when glyphosate was applied only once”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single glyphosate application delayed until weeds were 15 cm or taller gave the most effective and consistent season-long annual grass and broadleaf weed control in corn.

Treatment
a single glyphosate application was delayed until weeds were 15 cm or tallere1
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
season-long annual grass and broadleaf weed controle1
Direction
most effective and consistente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Glyphosate-Resistant Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“The most effective and consistent season-long annual grass and broadleaf weed control occurred when a single glyphosate application was delayed until weeds were 15 cm or taller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two glyphosate applications gave more consistent weed control than a single application when weeds were 10 cm tall or less in corn.

Treatment
Two glyphosate applicationse2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
weed controle2
Direction
more consistente2
Qualifier
when weeds were 10 cm tall or lesse2
Comparator
a single applicatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Glyphosate-Resistant Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two glyphosate applications provided more consistent weed control when weeds were 10 cm tall or less and higher corn grain yields when weeds were 5 cm tall or less, compared with a single application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two glyphosate applications gave higher corn grain yields than a single application when weeds were 5 cm tall or less.

Treatment
Two glyphosate applicationse2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
corn grain yieldse2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
when weeds were 5 cm tall or lesse2
Comparator
a single applicatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Glyphosate-Resistant Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two glyphosate applications provided more consistent weed control when weeds were 10 cm tall or less and higher corn grain yields when weeds were 5 cm tall or less, compared with a single application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–814 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two glyphosate applications gave weed control averaging at least 94% in 1998 and 97% in 1999 across all sites.

Treatment
two glyphosate applicationse3
Outcome
Weed controle3
Value
at least 94 and 97%e3
Qualifier
across all sites in 1998 and 1999, respectivelye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Glyphosate-Resistant Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–114 · show in text ↑
e3

“Weed control averaged at least 94 and 97% across all sites in 1998 and 1999, respectively, with two glyphosate applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–939 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control with two glyphosate applications was occasionally below 70%, because of late emergence of annual grass and Amaranthus spp. or reduced control of Ipomoea spp.

Treatment
two glyphosate applicationse3
Interactor
Amaranthus spp.Amaranthuse4weed
Second interactor
Ipomoea sppIpomoeae4weed
Outcome
Weed controle3
Value
less than 70%e4
Qualifier
because of late emergence of annual grass and Amaranthus spp. or reduced control of Ipomoea sppe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ipomoea
Ipomoea · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Tauʻolunga · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Glyphosate-Resistant Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–114 · show in text ↑
e3

“Weed control averaged at least 94 and 97% across all sites in 1998 and 1999, respectively, with two glyphosate applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–939 · show in text ↑
e4

“but was occasionally less than 70% because of late emergence of annual grass and Amaranthus spp. or reduced control of Ipomoea spp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1070 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With a single glyphosate application, corn grain yield was most often reduced when the application was delayed until weeds were 23 cm or taller.

Treatment
the application was delayed until weeds were 23 cm or tallere5
Interactor
weedse5weed
Outcome
corn grain yielde5
Direction
reducede5
Qualifier
With a single application of glyphosatee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“With a single application of glyphosate, corn grain yield was most often reduced when the application was delayed until weeds were 23 cm or taller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single glyphosate application at the 5-cm timing gave corn grain yield at 93% of the weed-free control.

Treatment
a single glyphosate application at the 5-, 10-, 15-, 23-, and 30-cm timingse6
Outcome
corn grain yieldse6
Direction
lowerinferrede6
Value
93e6
Qualifier
Averaged across all sites in 1998 and 1999e6
Comparator
weed-free controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Averaged across all sites in 1998 and 1999, corn grain yields from a single glyphosate application at the 5-, 10-, 15-, 23-, and 30-cm timings were 93, 94, 93, 91, and 79% of the weed-free control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single glyphosate application at the 10-cm timing gave corn grain yield at 94% of the weed-free control.

Treatment
a single glyphosate application at the 5-, 10-, 15-, 23-, and 30-cm timingse6
Outcome
corn grain yieldse6
Direction
lowerinferrede6
Value
94e6
Qualifier
Averaged across all sites in 1998 and 1999e6
Comparator
weed-free controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Averaged across all sites in 1998 and 1999, corn grain yields from a single glyphosate application at the 5-, 10-, 15-, 23-, and 30-cm timings were 93, 94, 93, 91, and 79% of the weed-free control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single glyphosate application at the 15-cm timing gave corn grain yield at 93% of the weed-free control.

Treatment
a single glyphosate application at the 5-, 10-, 15-, 23-, and 30-cm timingse6
Outcome
corn grain yieldse6
Direction
lowerinferrede6
Value
93e6
Qualifier
Averaged across all sites in 1998 and 1999e6
Comparator
weed-free controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Averaged across all sites in 1998 and 1999, corn grain yields from a single glyphosate application at the 5-, 10-, 15-, 23-, and 30-cm timings were 93, 94, 93, 91, and 79% of the weed-free control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single glyphosate application at the 23-cm timing gave corn grain yield at 91% of the weed-free control.

Treatment
a single glyphosate application at the 5-, 10-, 15-, 23-, and 30-cm timingse6
Outcome
corn grain yieldse6
Direction
lowerinferrede6
Value
91e6
Qualifier
Averaged across all sites in 1998 and 1999e6
Comparator
weed-free controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Averaged across all sites in 1998 and 1999, corn grain yields from a single glyphosate application at the 5-, 10-, 15-, 23-, and 30-cm timings were 93, 94, 93, 91, and 79% of the weed-free control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single glyphosate application at the 30-cm timing gave corn grain yield at 79% of the weed-free control.

Treatment
a single glyphosate application at the 5-, 10-, 15-, 23-, and 30-cm timingse6
Outcome
corn grain yieldse6
Direction
lowerinferrede6
Value
79%e6
Qualifier
Averaged across all sites in 1998 and 1999e6
Comparator
weed-free controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Averaged across all sites in 1998 and 1999, corn grain yields from a single glyphosate application at the 5-, 10-, 15-, 23-, and 30-cm timings were 93, 94, 93, 91, and 79% of the weed-free control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With weed reinfestation prevented, corn grain yield at the 5-cm timing was 101% of the weed-free control.

Treatment
the 5-, 10-, and 15-cm application timingse7
Outcome
corn grain yielde7
Direction
higherinferrede7
Value
101e7
Qualifier
When weed reinfestation was preventede7
Comparator
weed-free controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“When weed reinfestation was prevented, corn grain yield at the 5-, 10-, and 15-cm application timings was 101, 97, and 93% of the weed-free control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With weed reinfestation prevented, corn grain yield at the 10-cm timing was 97% of the weed-free control.

Treatment
the 5-, 10-, and 15-cm application timingse7
Outcome
corn grain yielde7
Direction
lowerinferrede7
Value
97e7
Qualifier
When weed reinfestation was preventede7
Comparator
weed-free controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“When weed reinfestation was prevented, corn grain yield at the 5-, 10-, and 15-cm application timings was 101, 97, and 93% of the weed-free control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With weed reinfestation prevented, corn grain yield at the 15-cm timing was 93% of the weed-free control.

Treatment
the 5-, 10-, and 15-cm application timingse7
Outcome
corn grain yielde7
Direction
lowerinferrede7
Value
93%e7
Qualifier
When weed reinfestation was preventede7
Comparator
weed-free controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“When weed reinfestation was prevented, corn grain yield at the 5-, 10-, and 15-cm application timings was 101, 97, and 93% of the weed-free control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1765 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatment had a significant effect on corn grain yield in 23 of the 35 sites when weed reinfestation was prevented with a second glyphosate application.

Treatment
herbicide treatmente7
Outcome
corn grain yielde7
Qualifier
in 23 of the 35 sites when weed reinfestation was prevented with a second glyphosate applicatione7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“There was a significant effect of herbicide treatment on corn grain yield in 23 of the 35 sites when weed reinfestation was prevented with a second glyphosate application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1602 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum timing for initial glyphosate application to avoid corn grain yield loss was when weeds were less than 10 cm tall, no more than 23 d after corn planting, and before corn passed the V4 stage.

Organ / stage
V4 stagee6
Outcome
optimum timing for initial glyphosate applicatione6
Qualifier
when weeds were less than 10 cm in height, no more than 23 d after corn planting, and when corn growth was not more advanced than the V4 stagee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Results of this study suggested that the optimum timing for initial glyphosate application to avoid corn grain yield loss was when weeds were less than 10 cm in height, no more than 23 d after corn planting, and when corn growth was not more advanced than the V4 stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1794–2062 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

77 papers: 42 positive, 35 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

glyphosate · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 33 positive, 8 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.