Paper · 2012 · Weed Technology

Evaluation of Application Program and Timing in Herbicide-Resistant Corn

Laura E. Lindsey; Wesley J. Everman; Andrew J. Chomas; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted from 2007 to 2009 in East Lansing, MI to evaluate three residual herbicide programs, three POST herbicide application timings, and two POST herbicides in glyphosate- and glufosinate-resistant corn. Herbicide programs included a residual PRE-applied herbicide followed by (fb) POST application (residual fb POST), a residual herbicide tank-mixed with a POST herbicide (residual + POST), and a nonresidual POST. Three POST herbicide application timings included early POST (EP), mid-POST (MP), and late POST (LP) at an average corn growth stage of V3/V4, V4/V5, and V5/V6, respectively. The two POST herbicides evaluated were glyphosate and glufosinate. Control of common lambsquarters and giant foxtail was evaluated 28 d after the LP application. Glyphosate often provided greater weed control than glufosinate. The LP application resulted in greater giant foxtail control compared with the EP application timing, which may be attributed to control of late-emerging weeds. The EP application timing improved common lambsquarters control compared with the LP application timing. The residual + POST program resulted in greater weed control compared with the residual fb POST program in all years. The effect of residual herbicide program, POST herbicide, and POST application timing on corn grain yield varied by year. In 2007, the use of glyphosate resulted in higher grain yield compared with glufosinate. In 2008, corn grain yield was the highest in the PRE fb POST program and with POST applications at EP and MP. To provide the most consistent weed control and minimize the likelihood of grain yield reductions, a PRE fb POST program applied at EP or MP is recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate often gave greater weed control than glufosinate.

Treatment
Glyphosatee0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
glufosinatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate often provided greater weed control than glufosinate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late POST application improved giant foxtail control relative to early POST.

Treatment
LP applicatione0
Interactor
giant foxtaile0weed
Outcome
giant foxtail controle0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
EP application timinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The LP application resulted in greater giant foxtail control compared with the EP application timing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early POST application improved common lambsquarters control relative to late POST.

Treatment
EP application timinge0
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
common lambsquarters controle0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
LP application timinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The EP application timing improved common lambsquarters control compared with the LP application timing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual plus POST gave greater weed control than residual followed by POST in all years.

Treatment
residual + POST programe0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
all yearse0
Comparator
residual fb POST programe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The residual + POST program resulted in greater weed control compared with the residual fb POST program in all years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide program, herbicide, and timing effects on corn grain yield varied by year.

Outcome
corn grain yield varied by yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of residual herbicide program, POST herbicide, and POST application timing on corn grain yield varied by year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2007 glyphosate gave higher grain yield than glufosinate.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
2007e0
Comparator
glufosinatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2007, the use of glyphosate resulted in higher grain yield compared with glufosinate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2008 grain yield was highest under PRE followed by POST.

Treatment
PRE fb POST programe0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
2008e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2008, corn grain yield was the highest in the PRE fb POST program”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2008 grain yield was highest with early and mid POST applications.

Treatment
POST applications at EP and MPe0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
2008e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2008, corn grain yield was the highest in the PRE fb POST program and with POST applications at EP and MP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1544 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend PRE followed by POST at early or mid timing for consistent weed control and reduced yield loss risk.

Outcome
PRE fb POST program applied at EP or MPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To provide the most consistent weed control and minimize the likelihood of grain yield reductions, a PRE fb POST program applied at EP or MP is recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1701 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

77 papers: 42 positive, 35 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

glyphosate · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 33 positive, 8 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.