Intervention effectmodel-written summary

KIH-485 at 500 g ai/ha gave better Texas panicum control than S-metolachlor by 9 WAT in corn field experiments in Burleson County, Texas.

A claim from Efficacy of KIH-485 on Texas Panicum (Panicum texanum) and Selected Broadleaf Weeds in Corn1 · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KIH-485 at 500 g ai/ha gave better Texas panicum control than S-metolachlor by 9 WAT in corn field experiments in Burleson County, Texas.

Treatment
KIH-485 at 500 g ai/hae2
Interactor
Texas panicume2weed
Outcome
Texas panicum controle2
Direction
bettere2
Qualifier
by 9 WATe2
Comparator
S-metolachlore2
Setting
Burleson County, Texase1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KIH-485 is an experimental herbicide being evaluated for preemergence weed control in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90
e1

“Field experiments were conducted in Burleson County, Texas, in 2003 and 2004 to compare weed control, corn tolerance, and corn yield with various rates of KIH-485 or S-metolachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–271
e2

“KIH-485 at 500 g ai/ha provided better Texas panicum control than S-metolachlor by 9 WAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–472

Title

Efficacy of KIH-485 on Texas Panicum (Panicum texanum) and Selected Broadleaf Weeds in Corn1

GREGORY L. STEELE; PETER J. PORPIGLIA; JAMES M. CHANDLER Weed Technology 2005. doi:10.1614/wt-04-229r1.1

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-4add0d6d0e795a33fcf56d8ef8d80513910ea7b5cbbbe8fa63b04f81a76aed6c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

pyroxasulfone · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.