Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In the following year, KIH-485 rates above 125 g/ha controlled velvetleaf better than any S-metolachlor rate alone in corn.

A claim from Efficacy of KIH-485 on Texas Panicum (Panicum texanum) and Selected Broadleaf Weeds in Corn1 · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the following year, KIH-485 rates above 125 g/ha controlled velvetleaf better than any S-metolachlor rate alone in corn.

Treatment
KIH-485 rates above 125 g/hae5
Interactor
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie5weed
Outcome
controlled velvetleafe5
Direction
bettere5
Qualifier
The following yeare5
Comparator
any rate of S-metolachlor alonee5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · InteractorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KIH-485 is an experimental herbicide being evaluated for preemergence weed control in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90
e5

“The following year, all KIH-485 rates above 125 g/ha controlled velvetleaf better than any rate of S-metolachlor alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–773

Title

Efficacy of KIH-485 on Texas Panicum (Panicum texanum) and Selected Broadleaf Weeds in Corn1

GREGORY L. STEELE; PETER J. PORPIGLIA; JAMES M. CHANDLER Weed Technology 2005. doi:10.1614/wt-04-229r1.1

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-f7818166fb7b432fdb38a75a7c6b1103f3bd49e5244679274b6369be7b12fdff · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

pyroxasulfone · Abutilon theophrasti · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.