Paper · 1996 · Weed Technology

Integration of Glyphosate and Quizalofop with Tillage for Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) Management in Continuous Annual Crop and Legume Plowdown Rotations

A. Lloyd Darwent; George W. Clayton; James C. Drabble; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted from 1987 to 1992 to determine the effectiveness of several treatments consisting of combinations of glyphosate and/or quizalofop with tillage to control quackgrass in legume plowdown and continuous annual crop rotations. The treatments were imposed on the quackgrass in 1987 and/or 1988, evaluated in 1989 (cycle 1), reimposed on the same plots in 1990 and/or 1991 and re-evaluated in 1992 (cycle 2). Where continuous barley was grown, glyphosate applied at 0.45 kg/ha before seeding in 1987 (cycle 1) and 1990 (cycle 2), and combined with fall tillage in the first two years of each cycle, reduced quackgrass shoot density and rhizome dry weight by more than 96%. In a legume plowdown rotation, consisting of barley underseeded to red clover followed by plowdown and barley in subsequent years, quackgrass was reduced by a similar amount by glyphosate at 0.45 kg/ha applied in 1987 and 1990 before seeding or in 1988 and 1991 at 5 d before or 6 wk after red clover plowdown. Quackgrass reduction from all of these treatments was as effective as the labelled rate of glyphosate (0.90 kg/ha) applied at the same times, and also as effective as glyphosate applied at 0.45 kg/ha in combination with tillage in a year of fallow. Without fall tillage the efficacy of glyphosate applied before seeding was reduced. Quizalofop at 0.20 kg/ha applied to canola in a rotation of canola followed by two years of barley, reduced quackgrass, but was less effective than glyphosate treatments with fall tillage. Reducing quackgrass populations resulted in significant increases in crop yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate with fall tillage reduced quackgrass shoot density by more than 96% in continuous barley.

Treatment
glyphosate applied at 0.45 kg/ha before seedinge0
Interactor
quackgrasse0weed
Outcome
quackgrass shoot densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
more than 96%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Where continuous barley was grown, glyphosate applied at 0.45 kg/ha before seeding in 1987 (cycle 1) and 1990 (cycle 2), and combined with fall tillage in the first two years of each cycle, reduced quackgrass shoot density and rhizome dry weight by more than 96%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate with fall tillage reduced quackgrass rhizome dry weight by more than 96% in continuous barley.

Treatment
glyphosate applied at 0.45 kg/ha before seedinge0
Interactor
quackgrasse0weed
Outcome
rhizome dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
more than 96%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Where continuous barley was grown, glyphosate applied at 0.45 kg/ha before seeding in 1987 (cycle 1) and 1990 (cycle 2), and combined with fall tillage in the first two years of each cycle, reduced quackgrass shoot density and rhizome dry weight by more than 96%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate in a legume plowdown rotation reduced quackgrass by a similar amount.

Treatment
glyphosate at 0.45 kg/hae0
Interactor
quackgrasse0weed
Outcome
quackgrasse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quackgrass was reduced by a similar amount by glyphosate at 0.45 kg/ha applied in 1987 and 1990 before seeding or in 1988 and 1991 at 5 d before or 6 wk after red clover plowdown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“consisting of barley underseeded to red clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduced glyphosate treatments controlled quackgrass as effectively as the labelled rate.

Treatment
all of these treatmentse0
Interactor
Quackgrasse0weed
Outcome
Quackgrass reductione0
Direction
as effectivee0
Comparator
labelled rate of glyphosate (0.90 kg/ha)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quackgrass reduction from all of these treatments was as effective as the labelled rate of glyphosate (0.90 kg/ha) applied at the same times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1145 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley underseeded to red clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting fall tillage reduced pre-seeding glyphosate efficacy.

Treatment
Without fall tillagee0
Outcome
efficacy of glyphosatee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Without fall tillage the efficacy of glyphosate applied before seeding was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1336 · show in text ↑
e1

“Where continuous barley was grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quizalofop reduced quackgrass in a canola rotation, but was less effective than glyphosate with fall tillage.

Treatment
Quizalofop at 0.20 kg/hae0
Interactor
quackgrasse0weed
Outcome
quackgrasse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
glyphosate treatments with fall tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quizalofop at 0.20 kg/ha applied to canola in a rotation of canola followed by two years of barley, reduced quackgrass, but was less effective than glyphosate treatments with fall tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1525 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced quackgrass populations significantly increased crop yields.

Taxon
Cropt0
Interactor
quackgrasse0weed
Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
increasese0

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing quackgrass populations resulted in significant increases in crop yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Annual Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–124 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.