Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during 1997-98 to 2000-2001 at Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur, to assess the role of various agrotechniqes in yield and quality of ratoon crops. Amongst agrotechniques tested, stubble shaving + trash burning followed by irrigation and cultivation recorded the high- est cane yield (60.62 and 50.90 tonnesfha during I and II ratoon respectively), commercial cane sugar (7.74 and 7.74 tonnesfha), net returns (Rs 53,144fha) and benefit : cost ratio (3.86) compared to least cane yield (46.87 and 34.10 tonnesfha), commercial cane sugar (6.06 and 4.71 tonnesfha, net returns (Rs, 35,588fha) and benefit : ratio (2.74) recorded under the control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Stubble shaving with trash burning, irrigation and cultivation gave the highest cane yield in the ratoon crops.
Verbatim
t0“Agrotechniques for multiple ratooning in sugarcane”
e1“recorded the high- est cane yield (60.62 and 50.90 tonnesfha during I and II ratoon respectively)”
e5“stubble shaving + trash burning followed by irrigation and cultivation”
e6“compared to least cane yield (46.87 and 34.10 tonnesfha), commercial cane sugar (6.06 and 4.71 tonnesfha, net returns (Rs, 35,588fha) and benefit : ratio (2.74) recorded under the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Stubble shaving with trash burning, irrigation and cultivation gave the highest commercial cane sugar yield.
Verbatim
t0“Agrotechniques for multiple ratooning in sugarcane”
e2“commercial cane sugar (7.74 and 7.74 tonnesfha)”
e5“stubble shaving + trash burning followed by irrigation and cultivation”
e6“compared to least cane yield (46.87 and 34.10 tonnesfha), commercial cane sugar (6.06 and 4.71 tonnesfha, net returns (Rs, 35,588fha) and benefit : ratio (2.74) recorded under the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Stubble shaving with trash burning, irrigation and cultivation gave the highest net returns.
Verbatim
t0“Agrotechniques for multiple ratooning in sugarcane”
e3“net returns (Rs 53,144fha)”
e5“stubble shaving + trash burning followed by irrigation and cultivation”
e6“compared to least cane yield (46.87 and 34.10 tonnesfha), commercial cane sugar (6.06 and 4.71 tonnesfha, net returns (Rs, 35,588fha) and benefit : ratio (2.74) recorded under the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Stubble shaving with trash burning, irrigation and cultivation gave the highest benefit:cost ratio.
Verbatim
t0“Agrotechniques for multiple ratooning in sugarcane”
e4“benefit : cost ratio (3.86)”
e5“stubble shaving + trash burning followed by irrigation and cultivation”
e6“compared to least cane yield (46.87 and 34.10 tonnesfha), commercial cane sugar (6.06 and 4.71 tonnesfha, net returns (Rs, 35,588fha) and benefit : ratio (2.74) recorded under the control”
The same questions in other papers
fire · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →irrigation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
138 papers more in this group
See all 142 papers →fire · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.