Paper · 2012 · Americanae (AECID Library)

Organic fertilizers and bauxite residue on nutrient availability and nutrition of sugar cane irrigated with potable water and wastewater

Fábio Olivieri de Nóbile; João Antônio Galbiatti; Reginaldo Itiro Muraishi

17
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of organic fertilizers (urban solid waste and swine manure) as a source of nutrients and residue from bauxite processing as a corrective of soil acidity, in area cultivated with sugar cane irrigated with potable water and served in the availability of phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and sulfur (S) levels in the soil andplants. For this experiment was carried out in pots, using a Alfisol, assessing the availability of the elements in the 0-20 cm layer and the concentration of these nutrients in the leaves of sugarcane. The data showed that the residues increased the concentrations of Ca and Mg in soil, as the concentration of K was not changed and S was not detected, due to the low concentration in the soil. In the leave +1 of sugarcane the residue of bauxite increased levels of N, P, K, Ca and Mg (15.68, 1.73, 10.43, 3.50 and 1.08 g kg-1, respectively). The application of urban solid waste and swine manure also increased the levels of N, K and Ca (11.56, 9.18 and 2.81 g kg-1, respectively). The quality of irrigation water did not alter the availability of P, K, Ca, Mg and S in the soil as well as the levels of these macronutrients in the plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residues increased soil Ca and Mg concentrations.

Treatment
residuese0
Outcome
concentrations of Ca and Mg in soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the residues increased the concentrations of Ca and Mg in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil K concentration was unchanged by residues.

Treatment
residuese0
Outcome
concentration of Ke0
Direction
not changede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the residues increased the concentrations of Ca and Mg in soil, as the concentration of K was not changed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–733 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S was not detected because soil concentration was low.

Outcome
S was not detectede0
Qualifier
due to the low concentration in the soile0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“S was not detected, due to the low concentration in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bauxite residue increased sugarcane leaf +1 N to 15.68 g kg-1.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
leave +1e0
Treatment
residue of bauxitee0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.68e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the leave +1 of sugarcane the residue of bauxite increased levels of N, P, K, Ca and Mg (15.68, 1.73, 10.43, 3.50 and 1.08 g kg-1, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bauxite residue increased sugarcane leaf +1 P to 1.73 g kg-1.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
leave +1e0
Treatment
residue of bauxitee0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.73e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the leave +1 of sugarcane the residue of bauxite increased levels of N, P, K, Ca and Mg (15.68, 1.73, 10.43, 3.50 and 1.08 g kg-1, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bauxite residue increased sugarcane leaf +1 K to 10.43 g kg-1.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
leave +1e0
Treatment
residue of bauxitee0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.43e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the leave +1 of sugarcane the residue of bauxite increased levels of N, P, K, Ca and Mg (15.68, 1.73, 10.43, 3.50 and 1.08 g kg-1, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bauxite residue increased sugarcane leaf +1 Ca to 3.50 g kg-1.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
leave +1e0
Treatment
residue of bauxitee0
Outcome
Cae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.50e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the leave +1 of sugarcane the residue of bauxite increased levels of N, P, K, Ca and Mg (15.68, 1.73, 10.43, 3.50 and 1.08 g kg-1, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bauxite residue increased sugarcane leaf +1 Mg to 1.08 g kg-1.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
leave +1e0
Treatment
residue of bauxitee0
Outcome
Mge0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.08 g kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the leave +1 of sugarcane the residue of bauxite increased levels of N, P, K, Ca and Mg (15.68, 1.73, 10.43, 3.50 and 1.08 g kg-1, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urban solid waste increased sugarcane N to the reported 11.56 g kg-1.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
urban solid wastee0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.56e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of urban solid waste and swine manure also increased the levels of N, K and Ca (11.56, 9.18 and 2.81 g kg-1, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1088 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the leave +1 of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urban solid waste increased sugarcane K to the reported 9.18 g kg-1.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
urban solid wastee0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.18e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of urban solid waste and swine manure also increased the levels of N, K and Ca (11.56, 9.18 and 2.81 g kg-1, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1088 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the leave +1 of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urban solid waste increased sugarcane Ca to the reported 2.81 g kg-1.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
urban solid wastee0
Outcome
Cae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.81 g kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of urban solid waste and swine manure also increased the levels of N, K and Ca (11.56, 9.18 and 2.81 g kg-1, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1088 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the leave +1 of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Swine manure increased sugarcane N to the reported 11.56 g kg-1.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
swine manuree0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.56e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of urban solid waste and swine manure also increased the levels of N, K and Ca (11.56, 9.18 and 2.81 g kg-1, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1088 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the leave +1 of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Swine manure increased sugarcane K to the reported 9.18 g kg-1.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
swine manuree0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.18e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of urban solid waste and swine manure also increased the levels of N, K and Ca (11.56, 9.18 and 2.81 g kg-1, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1088 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the leave +1 of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Swine manure increased sugarcane Ca to the reported 2.81 g kg-1.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
swine manuree0
Outcome
Cae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.81 g kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of urban solid waste and swine manure also increased the levels of N, K and Ca (11.56, 9.18 and 2.81 g kg-1, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1088 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the leave +1 of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water quality did not alter soil P, K or Ca availability.

Treatment
quality of irrigation watere0
Outcome
availability of P, K, Cae0
Direction
did not altere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The quality of irrigation water did not alter the availability of P, K, Ca, Mg and S in the soil as well as the levels of these macronutrients in the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water quality did not alter soil Mg or S availability.

Treatment
quality of irrigation watere0
Outcome
Mg and Se0
Direction
did not altere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The quality of irrigation water did not alter the availability of P, K, Ca, Mg and S in the soil as well as the levels of these macronutrients in the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water quality did not alter plant macronutrient levels.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
quality of irrigation watere0
Outcome
levels of these macronutrients in the plante0
Direction
did not altere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The quality of irrigation water did not alter the availability of P, K, Ca, Mg and S in the soil as well as the levels of these macronutrients in the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1245 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the leave +1 of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–828 · show in text ↑

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.