Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Total nitrogen accumulation did not differ significantly with nitrogen fertilization.

A claim from Biotechnological Potential of Endophytic Bacteria to Improve the Micropropagated Seedling of Variety RB92579 Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nitrogen accumulation did not differ significantly with nitrogen fertilization.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
accumulation of total-N in the tissuese0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
without nitrogen fertilizatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“the accumulation of total-N in the tissues showed no significant differences between treatments with and without nitrogen fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–967
t0

“Variety RB92579 Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–118

Title

Biotechnological Potential of Endophytic Bacteria to Improve the Micropropagated Seedling of Variety RB92579 Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)

Maria do Carmo Silva Barreto; Márcia do Vale Barreto Figueiredo; Márcia Vanusa da Silva; et al. Advances in Microbiology 2018. doi:10.4236/aim.2018.811057

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-2e57d2c5cd005704ad3cd29c4166e2a54503b4426116daa058d0557df55dec2e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.