Paper · 2010 · Scientia Agricola

Stalk yield and technological attributes of planted cane as related to nitrogen fertilization

Henrique Coutinho Junqueira Franco; Paulo Cesar Ocheuze Trivelin; Faroni Carlos Eduardo; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
80
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A still unclear question related to sugarcane cropping refers to the low response of the planted cane to nitrogen fertilization. Two experiments were carried out in areas under a Typic Hapludox, located in Pirassununga, São Paulo State, Brazil, and an Arenic Kandiudult, located in Jaboticabal, São Paulo State, Brazil, with the objective to evaluate planted cane response to nitrogen fertilization at planting. The experimental design was organized as random blocks and treatments consisted of three N rates (40, 80, and 120 kg ha-1 N-urea) and a control without N. Nitrogen fertilizers were applied to the bottom of the planting furrow and then incorporated into the soil. During the maximum growth stage, +1 leaf samples were collected from all experimental plots to evaluate the crop nutritional status. In the Pirassununga experiment, N fertilization at planting increased N, K, Mg, and S contents in the leaves and increased the stalk yield, without effect in the technological attributes. Conversely, no stalk yield response was observed at the Jaboticabal experiment, but N fertilization benefited the stalk technological attributes. The N rates increased the sugar yield per hectare in both experiments. The highest margin of agricultural contribution was obtained at the rate of 40 kg ha-1 N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting nitrogen increased leaf N, K, Mg and S contents in Pirassununga.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
N fertilization at plantinge0
Outcome
N, K, Mg, and S contents in the leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Pirassunungae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the Pirassununga experiment, N fertilization at planting increased N, K, Mg, and S contents in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting nitrogen increased sugarcane stalk yield in Pirassununga.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
N fertilization at plantinge0
Outcome
stalk yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Pirassunungae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the Pirassununga experiment, N fertilization at planting increased N, K, Mg, and S contents in the leaves and increased the stalk yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting nitrogen did not change technological attributes in Pirassununga.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
N fertilization at plantinge0
Outcome
technological attributese0
Direction
without effecte0
Setting
Pirassunungae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the Pirassununga experiment, N fertilization at planting increased N, K, Mg, and S contents in the leaves and increased the stalk yield, without effect in the technological attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting nitrogen did not change stalk yield in Jaboticabal.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
stalk yielde0
Direction
no stalk yield responsee0
Setting
Jaboticabale0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“no stalk yield response was observed at the Jaboticabal experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting nitrogen benefited sugarcane stalk technological attributes in Jaboticabal.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
stalk technological attributese0
Direction
benefitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“N fertilization benefited the stalk technological attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen rates increased sugar yield per hectare in both experiments.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
N ratese0
Outcome
sugar yield per hectaree0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“The N rates increased the sugar yield per hectare in both experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1211 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest agricultural contribution margin occurred at 40 kg ha-1 N.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
40 kg ha-1 Ne0
Outcome
margin of agricultural contributione0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest margin of agricultural contribution was obtained at the rate of 40 kg ha-1 N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1301 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.