Paper · 2019 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Biomass Accumulation and Industrial Yield of Irrigated Sugarcane Submitted to Sources and Doses of Nitrogen Grown in Cerrado Oxisol

N. F. da Silva; F. N. Cunha; M. B. Teixeira; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The sugar and alcohol sector have invested heavily in technologies to increase the productivity of sugarcane and consequently the gross income of sugar and alcohol; among these practices irrigation and fertilization stands out. Based on the hypothesis that the source and the availability of nitrogen influence the growth, development and yield of irrigated sugarcane in the cerrado region, this study aimed to evaluate the accumulation of biomass and yield to define the best source and dose of nitrogen fertilization in irrigated sugarcane, in the cane-plant cycle, in a very clayey dystrophic Red Latosol, cerrado phase. The experiment was carried out at the Raízen Plant, located in the municipality of Jataí-GO. Brazil. The variety IACSP95-5000 was used in a randomized block experimental design, analyzed in a split-split-plot scheme, with four replicates. The factors evaluated were in the plots of four N rate (0, 60, 120 and 180 kg ha-1); In the split-plot two N sources (urea and ammonium nitrate) and as split-split-plot were represented by four evaluation periods (210, 250, 290 and 330 days after the planting-DAP). The irrigation was by sprinkling, performed by a central pivot. The highest gross sugar yield and gross alcohol yield in the average source of 131.72 kg N ha-1 had an average increase of 32.19%, compared to without N application 0 kg N ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 131.72 kg N ha-1 increased gross sugar yield by 32.19% relative to no nitrogen application.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
131.72 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
gross sugar yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
32.19%e0
Comparator
without N application 0 kg N ha-1e0

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross sugar yield and gross alcohol yield in the average source of 131.72 kg N ha-1 had an average increase of 32.19%, compared to without N application 0 kg N ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 131.72 kg N ha-1 increased gross alcohol yield by 32.19% relative to no nitrogen application.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
131.72 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
gross alcohol yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
32.19%e0
Comparator
without N application 0 kg N ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross sugar yield and gross alcohol yield in the average source of 131.72 kg N ha-1 had an average increase of 32.19%, compared to without N application 0 kg N ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.