Paper · 2018 · Scientia Agricola

Effect of previous soil management on sugarcane response to nitrogen fertilization

Rafael Otto; Eduardo Mariano; Richard Lesley Mulvaney; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

N Fertilizer recommendations must be improved to optimize N use efficiency (NUE) for bioenergy crops. A study was conducted to test the hypothesis that sites varying in historical usage of by-product differ in soil N-supplying power and sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) responsiveness to N fertilization. Our aim was to quantify soil N availability and N fertilizer rates, sources, and application timings for their effects on sugarcane yield and NUE. Three N response trials, each involving 0 to 200 kg N ha−1, were conducted in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, at sites varying historically in the usage of vinasse. Before fertilizer application and at harvest, soil inorganic N content was quantified and potential N mineralization estimated by the Illinois Soil Nitrogen Test (ISNT); stalk yield and sugar content were measured at harvest and used to estimate NUE. Sugarcane showed significant response to N fertilization only at the sites with no history of vinasse usage. Reducing the N rate from 120 to 80 kg N ha−1 showed limited potential for lowering yield (~ 1 %), while increasing the NUE by 54 %, which was far better than the 14 % increase achieved by modifying the N source or application timing. Monitoring inorganic N and ISNT levels over time to estimate soil N-supplying power has potential for predicting the responsiveness of sugarcane to N fertilization; however, ISNT interpretations must consider factors that impede mineralization or crop N utilization, such as soil acidity or a limitation on the availability of Ca or P. Soil N testing can help optimize NUE for sustainable bioenergy production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane responded significantly to nitrogen fertilization only at sites without vinasse history.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
responsee0
Qualifier
only at the sites with no history of vinasse usagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane showed significant response to N fertilization only at the sites with no history of vinasse usage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing nitrogen from 120 to 80 kg N ha−1 had limited potential to lower yield by about 1%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Reducing the N rate from 120 to 80 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweringe0
Value
~ 1 %e0
Qualifier
limited potentiale0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing the N rate from 120 to 80 kg N ha−1 showed limited potential for lowering yield (~ 1 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing nitrogen from 120 to 80 kg N ha−1 increased NUE by 54%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Reducing the N rate from 120 to 80 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
54 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing the N rate from 120 to 80 kg N ha−1 showed limited potential for lowering yield (~ 1 %), while increasing the NUE by 54 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modifying nitrogen source or application timing achieved a 14% NUE increase.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
modifying the N source or application timinge0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
14 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increasing the NUE by 54 %, which was far better than the 14 % increase achieved by modifying the N source or application timing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Monitoring inorganic nitrogen and ISNT has potential to predict sugarcane nitrogen responsiveness, with mineralization and nutrient-use constraints considered.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
Monitoring inorganic N and ISNT levels over timee0
Qualifier
ISNT interpretations must consider factors that impede mineralization or crop N utilization, such as soil acidity or a limitation on the availability of Ca or Pe0

Verbatim

e0

“Monitoring inorganic N and ISNT levels over time to estimate soil N-supplying power has potential for predicting the responsiveness of sugarcane to N fertilization; however, ISNT interpretations must consider factors that impede mineralization or crop N utilization, such as soil acidity or a limitation on the availability of Ca or P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1540 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrogen testing can help optimize NUE for sustainable bioenergy production.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
Soil N testinge0
Qualifier
can help optimize NUE for sustainable bioenergy productione0

Verbatim

e0

“Soil N testing can help optimize NUE for sustainable bioenergy production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1615 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 118 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.