Paper · 2015 · Scientia Agricola

Residual recovery and yield performance of nitrogen fertilizer applied at sugarcane planting

Henrique Coutinho Junqueira Franco; Rafael Otto; André Cesar Vitti; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The low effectiveness of nitrogen fertilizer (N) is a substantial concern that threatens global sugarcane production. The aim of the research reported in this paper was to assess the residual effect of N-fertilizer applied at sugarcane planting over four crop seasons in relation to sugarcane crop yield. Toward this end three field experiments were established in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, during February of 2005 and July of 2009, in a randomized block design with four treatments: 0, 40, 80 and 120 kg ha−1 of N applied as urea during sugarcane planting. Within each plot, a microplot was established to which 15N-labeled urea was applied. The application of N at planting increased plant cane yield in two of the three sites and sucrose content at the other, whereas the only residual effect was higher sucrose content in one of the following ratoons. The combined effect was an increase in sugar yield for three of the 11 crop seasons evaluated. Over the crop cycle of a plant cane and three ratoon crops, only 35 % of the applied N was recovered, split 75, 13, 7 and 5 % in the plant cane, first, second and third ratoons, respectively. These findings document the low efficiency of N recovery by sugarcane, which increases the risk that excessive N fertilization will reduce profitability and have an adverse effect on the environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting nitrogen increased plant cane yield at two of three sites.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
application of N at plantinge0
Outcome
plant cane yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
two of the three sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of N at planting increased plant cane yield in two of the three sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting nitrogen increased sucrose content at the third site.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
application of N at plantinge0
Outcome
sucrose contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at the othere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of N at planting increased plant cane yield in two of the three sites and sucrose content at the other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The only residual effect was higher sucrose content in one ratoon.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
sucrose contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
one of the following ratoonse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“the only residual effect was higher sucrose content in one of the following ratoons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased sugar yield in three of eleven crop seasons.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
three of the 11 crop seasonse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combined effect was an increase in sugar yield for three of the 11 crop seasons evaluated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–956 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across plant cane and three ratoons, 35% of applied nitrogen was recovered.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
applied N was recoverede0
Value
35 %e0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Over the crop cycle of a plant cane and three ratoon crops, only 35 % of the applied N was recovered, split 75, 13, 7 and 5 % in the plant cane, first, second and third ratoons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant cane accounted for 75% of recovered nitrogen.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
plant canee0
Value
75e0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“split 75, 13, 7 and 5 % in the plant cane, first, second and third ratoons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First ratoon accounted for 13% of recovered nitrogen.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
firste0
Value
13e0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“split 75, 13, 7 and 5 % in the plant cane, first, second and third ratoons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second ratoon accounted for 7% of recovered nitrogen.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
seconde0
Value
7e0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“split 75, 13, 7 and 5 % in the plant cane, first, second and third ratoons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Third ratoon accounted for 5% of recovered nitrogen.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
third ratoonse0
Value
5 %e0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“split 75, 13, 7 and 5 % in the plant cane, first, second and third ratoons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1148 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.