Claim · model-written summary
N-Serve with urea did not improve fertilizer efficiency.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- Inclusion of N‐Serve with ureae0
- Outcome
- fertilizer efficiencye0
- Direction
- did not improvee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Inclusion of N‐Serve with urea did not improve fertilizer efficiency”
t0“Sugarcane”
Title
Nitrogen Leaching from Soil and Uptake by Sugarcane from Various Urea‐based Fertilizers
A. M. O. El Wali; F. le Grand; G. J. Gascho Soil Science Society of America Journal 1980. doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400010025x
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Sugarcane growth did not differ significantly among fertilizer treatments.
- Intervention effect Sugarcane nitrogen uptake did not differ significantly among fertilizer treatments.
- Observation Leached and residual nitrogen differed significantly among treatments.
- Observation Nitrogen leaching ranged from 6 to 24% of applied nitrogen by fertilizer and irrigation.
- Observation Applied nitrogen leached mainly as nitrate.
- Observation Early irrigation before complete nitrification caused considerable ammonium leaching.
- Intervention effect SCU application produced the least nitrogen leaching.
- Recommendation The authors judged SCU more promising for commercial use than urea plus N-Serve.
- Association Irrigation increased nitrogen leaching losses from all sources to varying degrees.
- Observation Eleven to fifteen percent of applied nitrogen was unaccounted for by plant, leachate or soil.