Abstract
Field experiment was conducted at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle in Anakapalle district of Andhra Pradesh in two subsequent seasons in sugarcane plant-ratoon sequence. Results revealed that significantly higher values of nitrogen use efficiency was observed with neem coated urea over normal urea. Significantly highest nitrogen uptake was recorded with 150% neem coated urea in plant and ratoon crops, respectively. An additional nitrogen uptake of 5 kg ha-1 was observed in neem coated urea than normal urea. There was no depletion of available nitrogen in post harvest soils and that was observed in both plant and ratoon crops in nitrogen treated plots irrespective of source of nitrogen. Available nitrogen status increased with increasing levels of nitrogen. Regarding available phosphorus and potassium, there were no significant differences among different nitrogen levels. Highest juice brix juice sucrose and juice purity were recorded with lower levels of nitrogen i.e 75% and 100% neem coated urea over higher doses of nitrogen i.e 125% and 150% neem coated urea. However, there was no significant difference between neem coated urea and normal urea regarding juice quality. Numerically higher cane and sugar yields were recorded with neem coated urea over normal urea.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Neem-coated urea significantly increased nitrogen-use efficiency over normal urea.
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher values of nitrogen use efficiency was observed with neem coated urea over normal urea.”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The 150% neem-coated urea dose gave the highest nitrogen uptake in plant and ratoon crops.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Organ / stage
- plant and ratoon cropse0
- Treatment
- 150% neem coated ureae0
- Outcome
- nitrogen uptakee0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Significantly highest nitrogen uptake was recorded with 150% neem coated urea in plant and ratoon crops, respectively.”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem-coated urea increased nitrogen uptake by 5 kg ha-1 over normal urea.
Verbatim
e0“An additional nitrogen uptake of 5 kg ha-1 was observed in neem coated urea than normal urea.”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Postharvest soil nitrogen was not depleted in nitrogen-treated plots.
Verbatim
e0“There was no depletion of available nitrogen in post harvest soils and that was observed in both plant and ratoon crops in nitrogen treated plots irrespective of source of nitrogen.”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Available soil nitrogen increased with nitrogen level.
Verbatim
e0“Available nitrogen status increased with increasing levels of nitrogen.”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Available phosphorus and potassium did not differ significantly among nitrogen levels.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- different nitrogen levelse0
- Outcome
- available phosphorus and potassiume0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Regarding available phosphorus and potassium, there were no significant differences among different nitrogen levels.”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Lower neem-coated urea levels gave the highest juice brix, sucrose, and purity versus higher doses.
Verbatim
e0“Highest juice brix juice sucrose and juice purity were recorded with lower levels of nitrogen i.e 75% and 100% neem coated urea over higher doses of nitrogen i.e 125% and 150% neem coated urea.”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Juice quality did not differ significantly between neem-coated and normal urea.
Verbatim
e0“there was no significant difference between neem coated urea and normal urea regarding juice quality.”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem-coated urea gave numerically higher cane and sugar yields.
Verbatim
e0“Numerically higher cane and sugar yields were recorded with neem coated urea over normal urea.”
t0“Sugarcane”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
133 papers more in this group
See all 137 papers →botanical · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →nitrogen · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →nitrogen · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →botanical · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.