Paper · 2021 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Different Amounts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Applications Alter the Bacterial Diversity and Community Structure in the Rhizosphere Soil of Sugarcane

Yan Gu; Jihua Wang; Weijun Cai; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
54
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sugarcane cropping systems receive elevated application of nitrogen (N) fertilizer for higher production, which may affect production costs and cause environmental pollution. Therefore, it is critical to elucidate the response of soil microbial to N fertilizer inputs in sugarcane soil. A field experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of optimum (N375, 375 kg N/ha) and excessive (N563, 563 kg N/ha) amounts of N fertilizer on soil bacterial diversity and community structure in a sugarcane cropping system by MiSeq high-throughput sequencing; 50,007 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were obtained by sequencing the 16S rRNA gene amplicons. Results showed that the most abundant phyla in the sugarcane rhizosphere soil were Proteobacteria , Actinobacteria , Acidobacteria , and Planctomycetes , whose ensemble mean accounted for 74.29%. Different amounts of N application indeed change the bacterial diversity and community structures. Excessive application of N fertilizers significantly decreased the pH and increased the available N in soils and unexpectedly obtained a lower yield. Excessive N resulted in a relatively lower bacterial species richness and significantly increased the relative abundance of phyla Proteobacteria , Acidobacteria , and Bacteroidetes and the genera Sphingomonas and Gemmatimonas , while optimum N treatment significantly increased the phylum Actinobacteria and the genera Bacillus and Nitrospira ( P < 0.05). N application shifted the N cycle in nitrification, mainly on the Nitrospira , but showed no significant effect on the genera related to nitrogen fixation, methane oxidation, sulfate reduction, and sulfur oxidation ( P > 0.05). Overall, the optimum amount of N application might be conducive to beneficial microorganisms, such as Actinobacteria , Nitrospira , and Bacillus and, thus, result in a healthier ecosystem and higher sustainable crop production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequencing recovered 50,007 OTUs from the sugarcane cropping system.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
operational taxonomic units (OTUs)e0
Value
50,007e0

Verbatim

e0

“50,007 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were obtained by sequencing the 16S rRNA gene amplicons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria and Planctomycetes were the most abundant phyla, together averaging 74.29%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
most abundant phyla in the sugarcane rhizosphere soile0
Value
74.29%e0

Verbatim

e0

“the most abundant phyla in the sugarcane rhizosphere soil were Proteobacteria , Actinobacteria , Acidobacteria , and Planctomycetes , whose ensemble mean accounted for 74.29%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application changed bacterial diversity and community structure.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Different amounts of N applicatione0
Outcome
bacterial diversity and community structurese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Different amounts of N application indeed change the bacterial diversity and community structures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess nitrogen significantly lowered soil pH.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Excessive application of N fertilizerse0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Excessive application of N fertilizers significantly decreased the pH and increased the available N in soils and unexpectedly obtained a lower yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess nitrogen increased available soil nitrogen.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Excessive application of N fertilizerse0
Outcome
available N in soilse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Excessive application of N fertilizers significantly decreased the pH and increased the available N in soils and unexpectedly obtained a lower yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess nitrogen lowered sugarcane yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Excessive application of N fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Excessive application of N fertilizers significantly decreased the pH and increased the available N in soils and unexpectedly obtained a lower yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess nitrogen reduced bacterial species richness.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Excessive Ne0
Outcome
bacterial species richnesse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Excessive N resulted in a relatively lower bacterial species richness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess nitrogen increased Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria and Bacteroidetes relative abundance.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Excessive Ne1
Outcome
relative abundance of phyla Proteobacteria , Acidobacteria , and Bacteroidetese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“significantly increased the relative abundance of phyla Proteobacteria , Acidobacteria , and Bacteroidetes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1282 · show in text ↑
e1

“Excessive N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess nitrogen increased Sphingomonas and Gemmatimonas relative abundance.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Excessive Ne1
Outcome
genera Sphingomonas and Gemmatimonase0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the genera Sphingomonas and Gemmatimonas , while optimum N treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1355 · show in text ↑
e1

“Excessive N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum nitrogen increased Actinobacteria abundance.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
optimum N treatmente0
Outcome
phylum Actinobacteriae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“optimum N treatment significantly increased the phylum Actinobacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1405 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum nitrogen increased Bacillus and Nitrospira abundance.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
optimum N treatmente0
Outcome
genera Bacillus and Nitrospirae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“optimum N treatment significantly increased the phylum Actinobacteria and the genera Bacillus and Nitrospira”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1444 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application shifted nitrification, mainly involving Nitrospira.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
N applicatione0
Interactor
NitrospiraNitrospirae0othert0
Outcome
N cycle in nitrificatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“N application shifted the N cycle in nitrification, mainly on the Nitrospira”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application had no significant effect on genera associated with nitrogen fixation, methane oxidation, sulfate reduction and sulfur oxidation.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
N applicatione2
Outcome
genera related to nitrogen fixation, methane oxidation, sulfate reduction, and sulfur oxidatione0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“showed no significant effect on the genera related to nitrogen fixation, methane oxidation, sulfate reduction, and sulfur oxidation ( P > 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1685 · show in text ↑
e2

“Different amounts of N application indeed change the bacterial diversity and community structures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 118 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 312 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.