Paper · 2005 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Integrated Weed Management Studies in Maize Based Intercropping System

Mahender Singh; Pushpendra Singh; V. Nepalia

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif seasons of 2001 and 2002 at Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur to study the effect of planting pattern and weed control methods on weeds and productivity of maize and soybean. Intercropping of maize with soybean, irrespective of their row ratio, effectively reduced the weed density and dry weight of weeds at 50 DAS compared to their pure cropping. The grain yield of maize in intercropping with soybean was statistically on par with its yield in pure stand; however, productivity of soybean crop was significantly reduced in intercropping system compared with its sole cropping. Maize-equivalent yield in maize+soybean (2: 2) planting pattern made remarkable improvement (55.55 q ha−1) compared to remaining planting patterns. Alachlor and pendimethalin integrated with one hoeing at 25 DAS were found superior in reducing population as well as dry matter of weed at 50 DAS. Alachlor+hoeing at 25 DAS gave the highest maize equivalent yield (50.88 q ha−1) which was on par with that obtained with pendimethalin+hoeing (49.09 q ha−1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping maize with soybean, irrespective of row ratio, reduced weed density and weed dry weight at 50 DAS compared with pure cropping.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Intercropping of maize with soybeane0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed density and dry weight of weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
pure croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated Weed Management Studies in Maize Based Intercropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercropping of maize with soybean, irrespective of their row ratio, effectively reduced the weed density and dry weight of weeds at 50 DAS compared to their pure cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield in intercropping with soybean was statistically on par with that in pure stand.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
intercropping with soybeane0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
on pare0
Comparator
pure stande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated Weed Management Studies in Maize Based Intercropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The grain yield of maize in intercropping with soybean was statistically on par with its yield in pure stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean productivity was significantly reduced in the intercropping system compared with sole cropping.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
intercropping systeme0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
sole croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated Weed Management Studies in Maize Based Intercropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“productivity of soybean crop was significantly reduced in intercropping system compared with its sole cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize-equivalent yield in the maize+soybean (2:2) planting pattern was markedly improved (55.55 q/ha) relative to the other planting patterns.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
maize+soybean (2: 2) planting patterne0
Outcome
Maize-equivalent yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
55.55 q ha−1e0
Comparator
remaining planting patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated Weed Management Studies in Maize Based Intercropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maize-equivalent yield in maize+soybean (2: 2) planting pattern made remarkable improvement (55.55 q ha−1) compared to remaining planting patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alachlor and pendimethalin integrated with one hoeing at 25 DAS were superior in reducing weed population and weed dry matter at 50 DAS.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Alachlor and pendimethalin integrated with one hoeing at 25 DASe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
population as well as dry matter of weede0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated Weed Management Studies in Maize Based Intercropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Alachlor and pendimethalin integrated with one hoeing at 25 DAS were found superior in reducing population as well as dry matter of weed at 50 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alachlor plus hoeing at 25 DAS gave the highest maize equivalent yield, 50.88 q/ha.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Alachlor+hoeing at 25 DASe0
Outcome
maize equivalent yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
50.88 q ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated Weed Management Studies in Maize Based Intercropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Alachlor+hoeing at 25 DAS gave the highest maize equivalent yield (50.88 q ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin plus hoeing gave a maize equivalent yield of 49.09 q/ha, on par with alachlor plus hoeing.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pendimethalin+hoeinge0
Outcome
maize equivalent yielde0
Direction
on pare0
Value
49.09 q ha−1e0
Comparator
Alachlor+hoeing at 25 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated Weed Management Studies in Maize Based Intercropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Alachlor+hoeing at 25 DAS gave the highest maize equivalent yield (50.88 q ha−1) which was on par with that obtained with pendimethalin+hoeing (49.09 q ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1088 · show in text ↑

Glycine max · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Glycine max · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 155 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

176 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

alachlor · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

intercropping · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 71 positive, 8 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

intercropping · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

218 papers: 131 positive, 87 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 131 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

214 papers more in this group

See all 218 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 613 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.