Abstract
Field experiments were conducted in central Missouri in 1989 and 1990 to evaluate weed control practices in conjunction with cover crops and cover management systems in reduced tillage corn. There was no difference in weed control among soybean stubble, hairy vetch, and rye soil cover when averaged over cover management systems and herbicide treatments. However, mowed hairy vetch and rye covers provided greater weed control in the no-till plots than soybean stubble when no herbicide was used. Differences in weed control among cover management systems were reduced or eliminated when a PRE herbicide was applied. corn population and height were reduced by hairy vetch and rye soil cover. Corn grain yield was reduced in rye plots both years. There was no difference in grain yield between tilled and no-till plots.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Weed control did not differ among soybean stubble, hairy vetch, and rye soil covers averaged over management and herbicide.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0 - Treatment
- soybean stubble, hairy vetch, and rye soil covere0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- no differencee0
- Comparator
- soybean stubble, hairy vetch, and rye soil covere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“There was no difference in weed control among soybean stubble, hairy vetch, and rye soil cover when averaged over cover management systems and herbicide treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Without herbicide in no-till plots, mowed hairy vetch and rye gave greater weed control than soybean stubble.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- mowed hairy vetch and rye coverse0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- soybean stubblee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“However, mowed hairy vetch and rye covers provided greater weed control in the no-till plots than soybean stubble when no herbicide was used.”
Claim · model-written summary
A PRE herbicide reduced or eliminated weed-control differences among cover management systems.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- PRE herbicidee0
- Outcome
- Differences in weed control among cover management systemse0
- Direction
- reduced or eliminatede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“Differences in weed control among cover management systems were reduced or eliminated when a PRE herbicide was applied.”
Claim · model-written summary
Hairy vetch and rye soil covers reduced corn population.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- hairy vetch and rye soil covere0
- Outcome
- corn populatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“corn population and height were reduced by hairy vetch and rye soil cover.”
Claim · model-written summary
Hairy vetch and rye soil covers reduced height.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- hairy vetch and rye soil covere0
- Outcome
- heighte0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“corn population and height were reduced by hairy vetch and rye soil cover.”
Claim · model-written summary
Rye plots had reduced corn grain yield in both years.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- rye plotse0
- Outcome
- Corn grain yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“Corn grain yield was reduced in rye plots both years.”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield did not differ between tilled and no-till plots.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- no-till plotse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- no differencee0
- Comparator
- tillede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
e0“There was no difference in grain yield between tilled and no-till plots.”
The same questions in other papers
Vicia villosa · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Vicia villosa · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Glycine max · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- negative
402 papers more in this group
See all 406 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.