Abstract
Tillage operation resulted in significant reduction in weed dry weight at all the growth stages and increased the grain yield over no tillage practice. The lowest weed dry weight and the highest grain yield in one season were recorded with 24 kg seed ha−1 Hand weedings at 25 and 45 DAS recorded significantly higher grain yield and lower weed dry weight at silking and maturity stages.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage significantly reduced weed dry weight at all growth stages relative to no tillage.
- Treatment
- Tillage operatione0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed dry weighte0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Comparator
- no tillage practicee0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tillage operation resulted in significant reduction in weed dry weight at all the growth stages and increased the grain yield over no tillage practice”
t0“Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage increased maize grain yield relative to no tillage.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tillage operation resulted in significant reduction in weed dry weight at all the growth stages and increased the grain yield over no tillage practice”
t0“Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
A seed rate of 24 kg seed ha−1 gave the lowest weed dry weight in one season.
- Treatment
- 24 kg seed ha−1e0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed dry weighte0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Qualifier
- in one seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lowest weed dry weight and the highest grain yield in one season were recorded with 24 kg seed ha−1”
t0“Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
A seed rate of 24 kg seed ha−1 gave the highest grain yield in one season.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lowest weed dry weight and the highest grain yield in one season were recorded with 24 kg seed ha−1”
t0“Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding at 25 and 45 DAS gave significantly higher maize grain yield.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Hand weedings at 25 and 45 DAS recorded significantly higher grain yield and lower weed dry weight at silking and maturity stages”
t0“Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding at 25 and 45 DAS gave lower weed dry weight at silking and maturity.
- Organ / stage
- silking and maturity stagese0
- Treatment
- Hand weedings at 25 and 45 DASe0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed dry weighte0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Hand weedings at 25 and 45 DAS recorded significantly higher grain yield and lower weed dry weight at silking and maturity stages”
t0“Maize”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
107 papers more in this group
See all 111 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.