Paper · 1993 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Efficacy of Atrazioe at Different Moisture Levels for Weed Management in Sugarcane under Mid-hill Conditions of Himachal Pradesh

J. P. Saini; I. S. Chakor; N. N. Angiras

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was carried out in a split plot design with combinations of two varieties of sugarcane (CO-1148 and COJ-64) and two moisture levels (irrigated and unirrigated) in main plots and five weed management treatments viz., unweeded control, weed free, atrazine 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 kg/ha applied as pre-emergence in sub plots. Variety CO-1148 produced significantly higher yield as compared to COJ-64 under both irrigated and unirrigated conditions. Weeds in unweeded check reduced the cane yield by 44.4% over weed free conditions. Weed free conditions recorded significantly higher yield and was statistically at par with atrazine 2.5 kg/ha. However under irrigated conditions atrazine 2.5 kg/ha produced significantly higher yield over atrazine 2.5 kg/ha uhder unirrigated conditions. Significantly highest Benefit/cost ratio was obtained with atrazine 2.5 kg/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CO-1148 yielded significantly more cane than COJ-64 under both moisture conditions.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
CO-1148e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under both irrigated and unirrigated conditionse0
Comparator
COJ-64e0

Verbatim

e0

“Variety CO-1148 produced significantly higher yield as compared to COJ-64 under both irrigated and unirrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–454 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unweeded conditions reduced cane yield by 44.4% versus weed-free conditions.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
unweeded checke0
Interactor
Weedse0weed
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
44.4%e0
Comparator
weed free conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“Weeds in unweeded check reduced the cane yield by 44.4% over weed free conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free conditions yielded significantly more and were statistically comparable to atrazine 2.5 kg/ha.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Weed free conditionse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
atrazine 2.5 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Weed free conditions recorded significantly higher yield and was statistically at par with atrazine 2.5 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine 2.5 kg/ha yielded significantly more under irrigation than without irrigation.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
atrazine 2.5 kg/hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
irrigated conditionse0
Comparator
unirrigated conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“under irrigated conditions atrazine 2.5 kg/ha produced significantly higher yield over atrazine 2.5 kg/ha uhder unirrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine 2.5 kg/ha had the highest benefit/cost ratio.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
atrazine 2.5 kg/hae0
Outcome
Benefit/cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly highest Benefit/cost ratio was obtained with atrazine 2.5 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑

atrazine · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Atrazine followed by trash mulching raised cane yield versus the other herbicide applications.

    Herbicidal-cum-Integrated Approach of Weed Management in Spring Planted Sugarcane · 2001 · compared with pre- and post-emergence application of 2,4-D, diuron, pendimethalene each at 1.0 kg ha−1 and oxyfluorfen 0.3 kg ha−1

    Same direction

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

herbicide · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

51 papers: 37 positive, 14 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.