Paper · 1998 · Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The)

Induced variability in homozygous and heterozygous genotypes of tobacco

S. Amarnath; Akhila Prasad

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Dry seeds of homozygous pure breeding lines of chewing tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.), Sona, bandi and their F1 hybrid were treated with chemical mutagen EMS at three concentrations (0.1, 0.3 and 0.5%) for 12 h. In M1 generation, based on seed germination and seedling growth, homozygous material was found to be more sensitive than heterozygous material. Complete seed mortality was observed following treatment with 0.5% EMS. In M2 generation, range widened for all characters in different populations. Mean values increased in F2 over midparent but was significantly lowered in M2 and F2 M2 for all the characters except total cured leaf yield. There was no significant difference in mean leaf thickness which marginally decreased in F2 and increased in M2 and F2 M2. Significant increase in nicotine content was observed in F1 and M2 but in F2 M2 it decreased significantly. A significant increase in variation was evident in F2 and M2 for all characters but in F2 M2 it was so for leaf breadth and first grade leaf yield. The magnitude of the induced variation was in order of M2 < F2 < F2 M2. Variations from hybridization and mutation were generally not cumulative.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Homozygous material was more sensitive than heterozygous material in seed germination and seedling growth.

Material
homozygous materiale0
Outcome
seed germination and seedling growthe0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
heterozygous materiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“based on seed germination and seedling growth, homozygous material was found to be more sensitive than heterozygous material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–354 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EMS at 0.5% caused complete seed mortality.

Treatment
0.5% EMSe0
Outcome
Complete seed mortalitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Complete seed mortality was observed following treatment with 0.5% EMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trait ranges widened in M2 populations.

Material
M2e0
Outcome
rangee0
Direction
widenede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In M2 generation, range widened for all characters in different populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trait means increased in F2 relative to midparent.

Material
F2e0
Outcome
Mean valuese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
midparente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean values increased in F2 over midparent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most trait means fell significantly in M2 and F2 M2, except cured leaf yield.

Material
M2 and F2 M2e0
Outcome
all the characters except total cured leaf yielde0
Direction
lowerede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was significantly lowered in M2 and F2 M2 for all the characters except total cured leaf yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean leaf thickness did not differ significantly.

Outcome
mean leaf thicknesse0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference in mean leaf thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf thickness marginally decreased in F2.

Material
F2e0
Outcome
mean leaf thicknesse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean leaf thickness which marginally decreased in F2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf thickness increased in M2 and F2 M2.

Material
M2 and F2 M2e0
Outcome
mean leaf thicknesse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean leaf thickness which marginally decreased in F2 and increased in M2 and F2 M2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicotine content increased significantly in F1 and M2.

Material
F1 and M2e0
Outcome
nicotine contente0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in nicotine content was observed in F1 and M2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicotine content decreased significantly in F2 M2.

Material
F2 M2e0
Outcome
nicotine contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in nicotine content was observed in F1 and M2 but in F2 M2 it decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variation increased significantly for all traits in F2 and M2.

Material
F2 and M2e0
Outcome
variatione0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant increase in variation was evident in F2 and M2 for all characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In F2 M2, variation rose significantly for leaf breadth and first grade leaf yield.

Material
F2 M2e0
Outcome
leaf breadth and first grade leaf yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in F2 M2 it was so for leaf breadth and first grade leaf yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Induced variation increased in the order M2, F2, F2 M2.

Outcome
magnitude of the induced variatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The magnitude of the induced variation was in order of M2 < F2 < F2 M2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybridization and mutation variation were generally not cumulative.

Outcome
Variations from hybridization and mutation were generally not cumulativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Variations from hybridization and mutation were generally not cumulative”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑