Abstract
Among the nitrogen (CAN), phosphorous (Super phosphate) and potassium (Muriate of potash) fertilizers, applied (at recommended dose) singly or incombmations showed plant swith potash alone, were heavily infested with Meloidogyne incognita, followed by phosphorous alone and both in combination. Minimum infestation was recorded with the application of all the three fertilizers in combination. Shoot weight was maximum in treated plants and minimum in plants with only potash Though, shoot length and root weight were not found significantly influenced with fertilizer applications, root weight responded similar to shoot weight.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Potash alone was associated with heavy Meloidogyne incognita infestation.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- potash alonee0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Outcome
- heavily infested with Meloidogyne incognitae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“plants with potash alone, were heavily infested with Meloidogyne incognita”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorous alone ranked next for infestation.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- phosphorous alonee0
- Outcome
- followed by phosphorous alonee0
- Direction
- followed bye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by phosphorous alone and both in combination”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined phosphorous and potash also ranked after potash alone for infestation.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- both in combinatione0
- Outcome
- followed by phosphorous alone and both in combinatione0
- Direction
- followed bye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by phosphorous alone and both in combination”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined application of all three fertilizers gave minimum infestation.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- application of all the three fertilizers in combinatione0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
- Outcome
- infestatione0
- Direction
- Minimume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Minimum infestation was recorded with the application of all the three fertilizers in combination”
t0“Meloidogyne incognita infestation and plant growth in tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot weight was maximum in treated plants and minimum with potash only.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- treated plantse0
- Outcome
- Shoot weighte0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- plants with only potashe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Shoot weight was maximum in treated plants and minimum in plants with only potash”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer application did not significantly influence shoot length.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- fertilizer applicationse0
- Outcome
- shoot lengthe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“shoot length and root weight were not found significantly influenced with fertilizer applications”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer application did not significantly influence root weight.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- fertilizer applicationse0
- Outcome
- root weighte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“shoot length and root weight were not found significantly influenced with fertilizer applications”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Root weight followed the pattern of shoot weight.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Outcome
- root weighte0
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- shoot weighte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root weight responded similar to shoot weight”
t0“tomato”
The same questions in other papers
potassium · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
fertilization · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 567 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
664 papers more in this group
See all 668 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.