Paper · 2015

The impact of leguminous culture system and sowing dates on the cereal yield in mountainous South-Kivu: Case of Burhale

Clérisse M. Casinga; Legrand T. Cirimwami; Espoir B. Bisimwa; et al.

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Despite their potential yield, the adoption of climbing beans in mountainous South Kivu is limited by the lack of technologies. Thus, appropriate technologies corresponding to poor farmer incomes should be adapted in terms of labour, soil and investment in capital so that intercropping would replace stakes and allow a better soil cover. This study was carried out at Burhale during two cultural seasons A2011 and A2012 in four sites comprising 9 trials each. The varieties used were: maize, soya-bean and beans. NPK and manure were also used. The MOJA was applied in 1st and 3rd trials and the MBILI in 2nd and 4th ones. Monoculture was practiced in 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th trials. Beans were sown 10 to 15 days after maize in 1st and 3rd trials. In 2nd, 4th and 7th trials this happened 20 to 30 days after maize. Soya-beans were sown simultaneously with maize in the 5th MBILI trial and in the 8th monoculture trial. Maize was sown on the experiment launching day. Leguminous plant yield was inferior (259.26; 271.88; 0 and 0 kg.ha-1 respectively for 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th trials) to that of monoculture (2711.11 and 1100.18kg.ha-1 respectively for 6th and 7th trials). Maize yield was inferior (7564.4; 5397; 10279.61 and 842.91kg.ha-1 respectively for 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th trials) to that of the 9th monoculture trial (7957.4kg.ha-1). Good LERs of 1.01 and 1.25 were found for 1st and 3rd; they were bad (0.76; 0.92 and 0.69) for 2nd, 4th and 5th trials.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leguminous plant yield in the intercropping trials was lower than in monoculture (259.26 to 271.88 kg/ha in trials 1-2).

Taxon
leguminous plante1
Treatment
leguminous culture systemt0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
inferiore1
Value
259.26; 271.88; 0 and 0 kg.ha-1e1
Comparator
monoculturee1
Setting
Burhalee0

Verbatim

t0

“leguminous culture system and sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study was carried out at Burhale during two cultural seasons A2011 and A2012 in four sites comprising 9 trials each”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leguminous plant yield was inferior (259.26; 271.88; 0 and 0 kg.ha-1 respectively for 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th trials) to that of monoculture (2711.11 and 1100.18kg.ha-1 respectively for 6th and 7th trials)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield in the intercropping trials was lower than in the 9th monoculture trial.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Treatment
leguminous culture systemt0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
inferiore1
Value
7564.4; 5397; 10279.61 and 842.91kg.ha-1e1
Comparator
9th monoculture triale1
Setting
Burhalee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“leguminous culture system and sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study was carried out at Burhale during two cultural seasons A2011 and A2012 in four sites comprising 9 trials each”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize yield was inferior (7564.4; 5397; 10279.61 and 842.91kg.ha-1 respectively for 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th trials) to that of the 9th monoculture trial (7957.4kg.ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1338 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Land equivalent ratios of 1.01 and 1.25 were good for the 1st and 3rd intercropping trials.

Taxon
maize, soya-bean and beanse2
Outcome
LERse1
Value
1.01 and 1.25e1
Qualifier
Goode1
Setting
Burhalee0

Verbatim

e0

“This study was carried out at Burhale during two cultural seasons A2011 and A2012 in four sites comprising 9 trials each”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“Good LERs of 1.01 and 1.25 were found for 1st and 3rd; they were bad (0.76; 0.92 and 0.69) for 2nd, 4th and 5th trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1458 · show in text ↑
e2

“The varieties used were: maize, soya-bean and beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–512 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Land equivalent ratios of 0.76, 0.92 and 0.69 were bad for the 2nd, 4th and 5th intercropping trials.

Taxon
maize, soya-bean and beanse2
Outcome
LERse1
Value
0.76; 0.92 and 0.69e1
Qualifier
bade1
Setting
Burhalee0

Verbatim

e0

“This study was carried out at Burhale during two cultural seasons A2011 and A2012 in four sites comprising 9 trials each”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“Good LERs of 1.01 and 1.25 were found for 1st and 3rd; they were bad (0.76; 0.92 and 0.69) for 2nd, 4th and 5th trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1458 · show in text ↑
e2

“The varieties used were: maize, soya-bean and beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–512 · show in text ↑

in vitro · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 44 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.