Paper · 2015 · Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture)

Organic potatoes, reduced tillage and mulch in temperate climates

Maria R. Finckh; Christian Bruns; Jelena Baćanović; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiments with mulching were done in a systems approach comparing potatoes as they are typically produced in Germany with ploughing to a system of non-inversion tillage combined with mulch. As the plots are integrated in two long-term experiments comparing ploughed versus minimum tillage it was not possible to integrate a mulched ploughed treatment or a non-mulched non-inversion tillage due to restrictions in plot size. We tested the effects of mulching in a ploughed system in 2015. There was no late blight but good erosion control (Pict.5) and yields were increased through mulching. Compost effects on the system were so far not clearly visible. It will most likely take several more years of regular applications to start seeing changes in system performance. Overall, mulching will change the potato system and it will depend very much on the local soil and climatic conditions if and when mulching will be positive (Table 1). On the one hand, mulching is labor intensive and requires the availability of materials to use. Besides freshly cut materials silage is an alternative option some farmers are using in vegetables in Germany. This reduces the dependence on the growing conditions for the mulch early in the season and likely also increases the fertilization effect. Farms that have no animals often mulch grass-clover. This will suppress N-fixation by the clover due to the nutrients in the mulch and thus reduce the usefulness of the grass-clover for nutrient accumulation. In addition it may result in leaching and thus loss of nutrients and even potentially harm the environment. Using the first and most rich harvest as mulch in the potatoes or alternatively making silage for later use is easier than composting such materials. Once the mulch is applied, no more mechanical weed control is done saving labor and energy. More importantly, it will also reduce the mechanical damage done to the potato foliage that makes them more susceptible to infections and it allows for profuse growth of fine roots into the applied mulch materials. Mulching also reduced Colorado potato beetles in both years to some extent but these data need confirmation. Also, the residual effects on the subsequent crop after the potatoes due to the increased input of organic amendments still need to be studied. Ecologically speaking mulching has many advantages. These advantages are especially important in water restricted areas. If and how mulching is feasible and economical depends on the specific conditions and organization of a farm, however.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching gave good erosion control in the potato experiment.

Treatment
mulchinge0
Outcome
erosion controle0
Direction
goode0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“There was no late blight but good erosion control (Pict.5) and yields were increased through mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato yields increased with mulching.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
mulchinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yields were increased through mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost effects on system performance were not yet clear.

Outcome
Compost effects on the systeme0
Qualifier
so far not clearly visiblee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compost effects on the system were so far not clearly visible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching reduced Colorado potato beetles to some extent in both years, but confirmation is needed.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
Mulchinge0
Interactor
Colorado potato beetlesLeptinotarsa decemlineatae0pest
Outcome
Colorado potato beetlese0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in both years to some extent but these data need confirmatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leptinotarsa decemlineata
Leptinotarsa decemlineata · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulching also reduced Colorado potato beetles in both years to some extent but these data need confirmation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2064–2171 · show in text ↑
t0

“potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–16 · show in text ↑

mulching · Leptinotarsa decemlineata · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mulching · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

64 papers: 57 positive, 7 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.