Paper · 2003 · Progressive Agriculture

Response of boro rice cultivars to varying weed management practices

Vinod Kumar; UP Singh; Ranjan Dwivedi

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Farm, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, SHU, Varanasi U.P. situated at 128.9 m above mean sea level, 25 18N latitude and 80 36E longitudes during dry season of 1997–98. The experiment was conducted in split plot design with three replications. Six cultivars viz., Gautarn, Prabhat CN-88 C-1-271, RAU 504-48-4, Pusa 2–21 and Rasi were kept in main plots and three weed management practices i.e. control, two hand weedings (30 and 50 DAT) and butachlor (1.5kg/ha) pre-emergence + 2,4-D (0.5kg/ha) post-emergence were abjusted in sub plots. Seeds were sown in nursery in first week on November and transplanting was done in deepwater field with residual water stagnation in 2nd fortnight of February. Predominant weeds were Marsilea minuta, Sirpus erectus L., Cyperus rotundus L., ipomea aquatica Forsk, Nyrnphea nouchale Burm, Cynodon dactylon (L) Pers, Echinochloa colonum (L) Link, paspalum distichum L., Ecliptaalba (L) Hassk and pistea stratiotes L. Results indicated that application of butachlor 1.5kg/ha + 2,4-D 0.5kg/ha was most effective in minimizing the weed infestation and maximizing the yield of bore rice. This treatment was on par with hand weeding twice 30 & 50 DAT in respect to weed management ane grain yield which had highest production. Among the cultivars, Prabhat proved to be betyter competitor against weeds and had minimum weed growth on accounts of its more vigorous growth and droopy lower leaves. However, the maximum grain yield was recorded under cultivar Gautam and minimum under RAU 504-48-4.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butachlor plus 2,4-D minimized weed infestation.

Taxon
boro ricet0
Treatment
butachlor 1.5kg/ha + 2,4-D 0.5kg/hae0
Outcome
weed infestatione0
Direction
minimizinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of butachlor 1.5kg/ha + 2,4-D 0.5kg/ha was most effective in minimizing the weed infestation and maximizing the yield of bore rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butachlor plus 2,4-D maximized bore rice yield.

Taxon
boro ricet0
Treatment
butachlor 1.5kg/ha + 2,4-D 0.5kg/hae0
Outcome
yield of bore ricee0
Direction
maximizinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of butachlor 1.5kg/ha + 2,4-D 0.5kg/ha was most effective in minimizing the weed infestation and maximizing the yield of bore rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1178 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The chemical treatment matched two hand weedings for weed management and grain yield.

Taxon
boro ricet0
Outcome
weed management ane grain yielde0
Direction
on pare0
Comparator
hand weeding twice 30 & 50 DATe0

Verbatim

t0

“boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“This treatment was on par with hand weeding twice 30 & 50 DAT in respect to weed management ane grain yield which had highest production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1316 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prabhat competed best against weeds and had minimum weed growth.

Taxon
boro ricet0
Material
Prabhate0
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
minimume0
Qualifier
more vigorous growth and droopy lower leavese0

Verbatim

t0

“boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the cultivars, Prabhat proved to be betyter competitor against weeds and had minimum weed growth on accounts of its more vigorous growth and droopy lower leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1484 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gautam had the highest grain yield.

Taxon
boro ricet0
Material
Gautame0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Verbatim

t0

“boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“the maximum grain yield was recorded under cultivar Gautam and minimum under RAU 504-48-4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1584 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAU 504-48-4 had the lowest grain yield.

Taxon
boro ricet0
Material
RAU 504-48-4e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
minimume0

Verbatim

t0

“boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“the maximum grain yield was recorded under cultivar Gautam and minimum under RAU 504-48-4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1584 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

butachlor · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

90 papers: 82 positive, 8 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

butachlor · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

97 papers: 90 positive, 7 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 52 positive, 10 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.