Paper · 2005 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Balanced fertilization of greengram (Vigna radiata var radiata) cultivars on a multi-nutrient deficient Typic Ustochrept soil

A. N. Ganeshamurthy; Ch. Srinivasarao; Masood Alp; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2001-2002 on typic Ustochrepts of Kanpur (Uttar Pradesh), lo evaluate the performance ofgreengram [Vigna radiata var radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] cultivars to balanced fertilizer application. One level of nitrogen (20 kg/ha), 3 levels of phosphorus (8.75, 17.5 and 26.2 kg/ha), 4 levels of sulphur (20, 40 and 60 kg/ha). 1 level each of potassium (50 kg/ha), zinc (5 kg/ha) and boron (1 kg/ha) were superimposed one over the other in randomized block design with 3 replications. There was 2-fold increase in biomass with P application and 2.5-fold increase with S application. 'Samrat' and 'NM 1' responded to applied zinc, while 'PDM 11' and 'PDM 54' did not show any response. Higher fertility levels (26.2 kg P/ha and 40 kg S/ha) were not effective in increasing the nodulation or the yield levels. The benefit that greengram can derive from nutrient application may be limited to the level of their deficiency corrections in the soil. in spite of significant relationship observed between nodulation and seed yield (r=0.688), this was not in commensurate with the extent of differences observed in seed yield (1 667 to 2 154 kg/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application doubled greengram biomass.

Treatment
P applicatione0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was 2-fold increase in biomass with P application and 2.5-fold increase with S application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S application increased greengram biomass 2.5-fold.

Treatment
S applicatione0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.5-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was 2-fold increase in biomass with P application and 2.5-fold increase with S application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Samrat responded to applied zinc.

Material
Samrate0
Treatment
applied zince0
Outcome
respondede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Samrat' and 'NM 1' responded to applied zinc, while 'PDM 11' and 'PDM 54' did not show any response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NM 1 responded to applied zinc.

Material
NM 1e0
Treatment
applied zince0
Outcome
respondede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Samrat' and 'NM 1' responded to applied zinc, while 'PDM 11' and 'PDM 54' did not show any response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PDM 11 showed no response to applied zinc.

Material
PDM 11e0
Treatment
applied zince0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
did not show any responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Samrat' and 'NM 1' responded to applied zinc, while 'PDM 11' and 'PDM 54' did not show any response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PDM 54 showed no response to applied zinc.

Material
PDM 54e0
Treatment
applied zince0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
did not show any responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Samrat' and 'NM 1' responded to applied zinc, while 'PDM 11' and 'PDM 54' did not show any response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher P and S fertility levels did not increase nodulation.

Treatment
26.2 kg P/ha and 40 kg S/hae0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
were not effective in increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher fertility levels (26.2 kg P/ha and 40 kg S/ha) were not effective in increasing the nodulation or the yield levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher P and S fertility levels did not increase yield.

Treatment
26.2 kg P/ha and 40 kg S/hae0
Outcome
yield levelse0
Direction
were not effective in increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher fertility levels (26.2 kg P/ha and 40 kg S/ha) were not effective in increasing the nodulation or the yield levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodulation and seed yield were significantly associated, with r=0.688.

Organ / stage
nodulatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Value
r=0.688e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in spite of significant relationship observed between nodulation and seed yield (r=0.688), this was not in commensurate with the extent of differences observed in seed yield (1 667 to 2 154 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 66 positive, 2 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.