Paper · 2014 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Nutrient management in mung bean (Vigna radiatal.) through sulphur and biofertilizers

Lal Bahadur; D.D. Tiwari

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To study the effect of nutrient management in mung bean through sulphur and biofertilizers, a field experiment was carried out during 2006 and 2007. The treatments contained four levels of sulphur i.e. 0, 15, 30, 45 kg ha−1 and four levels of biofertilizersviz. Uninoculated, Rhizobium, PSB and Rhizobium + PSB with 4 replications in factorial RBD. Results indicated that application of sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1 significantly increased the plant height (44.6 cm), primary branches (5.18), effective pods plant−1(27.8), grains pods−1(11.0), 1000 grain wt. (35.7g), grain and stover yield (12.0 and 28.1 q ha−1), nitrogen uptake (86.05 kg ha−1), phosphorus uptake (10.06 kg ha−1), sulphur uptake (7.71 kg ha−1) and quality parameters like protein (24.56%) and methionine (5.96 g/100 g N) in comparison to sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1. Application of sulphur @ 15 kg S ha1 significantly and linearly decreased the PSB population. Actinomycetes population was not significantly affected by the treatments. H owever, sulfur application showed a diminishing trend in the population of actinomycetes. Rhizobium and PSB inoculation also showed significant response to all the parameters and showed better response when co-inoculated (Rhizobium + PSB). However, total bacterial population (41.7 x 106 g1 soil), Rhizobium like organism (RLO) population (13.9 x 103 g1 soil) and Azotobacter population (12 x 103 g 1 soil) significantly increased up to the level of 15 kg S ha 1. Rhizobium and PSB inoculation showed significant response to all the parameters and showed better response when co-inoculated with Rhizobium + PSB.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 30 kg ha−1 increased plant height versus 15 kg ha−1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
44.6 cme0
Comparator
sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1 significantly increased the plant height (44.6 cm), primary branches (5.18), effective pods plant−1(27.8), grains pods−1(11.0), 1000 grain wt. (35.7g), grain and stover yield (12.0 and 28.1 q ha−1), nitrogen uptake (86.05 kg ha−1), phosphorus uptake (10.06 kg ha−1), sulphur uptake (7.71 kg ha−1) and quality parameters like protein (24.56%) and methionine (5.96 g/100 g N) in comparison to sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 30 kg ha−1 increased primary branches versus 15 kg ha−1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
primary branchese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.18e0
Comparator
sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1 significantly increased the plant height (44.6 cm), primary branches (5.18), effective pods plant−1(27.8), grains pods−1(11.0), 1000 grain wt. (35.7g), grain and stover yield (12.0 and 28.1 q ha−1), nitrogen uptake (86.05 kg ha−1), phosphorus uptake (10.06 kg ha−1), sulphur uptake (7.71 kg ha−1) and quality parameters like protein (24.56%) and methionine (5.96 g/100 g N) in comparison to sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 30 kg ha−1 increased effective pods plant−1 versus 15 kg ha−1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
effective pods plant−1e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.8e0
Comparator
sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1 significantly increased the plant height (44.6 cm), primary branches (5.18), effective pods plant−1(27.8), grains pods−1(11.0), 1000 grain wt. (35.7g), grain and stover yield (12.0 and 28.1 q ha−1), nitrogen uptake (86.05 kg ha−1), phosphorus uptake (10.06 kg ha−1), sulphur uptake (7.71 kg ha−1) and quality parameters like protein (24.56%) and methionine (5.96 g/100 g N) in comparison to sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 30 kg ha−1 increased grains pods−1 versus 15 kg ha−1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
grains pods−1e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.0e0
Comparator
sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1 significantly increased the plant height (44.6 cm), primary branches (5.18), effective pods plant−1(27.8), grains pods−1(11.0), 1000 grain wt. (35.7g), grain and stover yield (12.0 and 28.1 q ha−1), nitrogen uptake (86.05 kg ha−1), phosphorus uptake (10.06 kg ha−1), sulphur uptake (7.71 kg ha−1) and quality parameters like protein (24.56%) and methionine (5.96 g/100 g N) in comparison to sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 30 kg ha−1 increased 1000 grain wt. versus 15 kg ha−1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
1000 grain wt.e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35.7ge0
Comparator
sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1 significantly increased the plant height (44.6 cm), primary branches (5.18), effective pods plant−1(27.8), grains pods−1(11.0), 1000 grain wt. (35.7g), grain and stover yield (12.0 and 28.1 q ha−1), nitrogen uptake (86.05 kg ha−1), phosphorus uptake (10.06 kg ha−1), sulphur uptake (7.71 kg ha−1) and quality parameters like protein (24.56%) and methionine (5.96 g/100 g N) in comparison to sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 30 kg ha−1 increased grain versus 15 kg ha−1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.0e0
Comparator
sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1 significantly increased the plant height (44.6 cm), primary branches (5.18), effective pods plant−1(27.8), grains pods−1(11.0), 1000 grain wt. (35.7g), grain and stover yield (12.0 and 28.1 q ha−1), nitrogen uptake (86.05 kg ha−1), phosphorus uptake (10.06 kg ha−1), sulphur uptake (7.71 kg ha−1) and quality parameters like protein (24.56%) and methionine (5.96 g/100 g N) in comparison to sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 30 kg ha−1 increased stover yield versus 15 kg ha−1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.1 q ha−1e0
Comparator
sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1 significantly increased the plant height (44.6 cm), primary branches (5.18), effective pods plant−1(27.8), grains pods−1(11.0), 1000 grain wt. (35.7g), grain and stover yield (12.0 and 28.1 q ha−1), nitrogen uptake (86.05 kg ha−1), phosphorus uptake (10.06 kg ha−1), sulphur uptake (7.71 kg ha−1) and quality parameters like protein (24.56%) and methionine (5.96 g/100 g N) in comparison to sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 30 kg ha−1 increased nitrogen uptake versus 15 kg ha−1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
86.05 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1 significantly increased the plant height (44.6 cm), primary branches (5.18), effective pods plant−1(27.8), grains pods−1(11.0), 1000 grain wt. (35.7g), grain and stover yield (12.0 and 28.1 q ha−1), nitrogen uptake (86.05 kg ha−1), phosphorus uptake (10.06 kg ha−1), sulphur uptake (7.71 kg ha−1) and quality parameters like protein (24.56%) and methionine (5.96 g/100 g N) in comparison to sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 30 kg ha−1 increased phosphorus uptake versus 15 kg ha−1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
phosphorus uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.06 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1 significantly increased the plant height (44.6 cm), primary branches (5.18), effective pods plant−1(27.8), grains pods−1(11.0), 1000 grain wt. (35.7g), grain and stover yield (12.0 and 28.1 q ha−1), nitrogen uptake (86.05 kg ha−1), phosphorus uptake (10.06 kg ha−1), sulphur uptake (7.71 kg ha−1) and quality parameters like protein (24.56%) and methionine (5.96 g/100 g N) in comparison to sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 30 kg ha−1 increased sulphur uptake versus 15 kg ha−1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
sulphur uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.71 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1 significantly increased the plant height (44.6 cm), primary branches (5.18), effective pods plant−1(27.8), grains pods−1(11.0), 1000 grain wt. (35.7g), grain and stover yield (12.0 and 28.1 q ha−1), nitrogen uptake (86.05 kg ha−1), phosphorus uptake (10.06 kg ha−1), sulphur uptake (7.71 kg ha−1) and quality parameters like protein (24.56%) and methionine (5.96 g/100 g N) in comparison to sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 30 kg ha−1 increased protein versus 15 kg ha−1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24.56%e0
Comparator
sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1 significantly increased the plant height (44.6 cm), primary branches (5.18), effective pods plant−1(27.8), grains pods−1(11.0), 1000 grain wt. (35.7g), grain and stover yield (12.0 and 28.1 q ha−1), nitrogen uptake (86.05 kg ha−1), phosphorus uptake (10.06 kg ha−1), sulphur uptake (7.71 kg ha−1) and quality parameters like protein (24.56%) and methionine (5.96 g/100 g N) in comparison to sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 30 kg ha−1 increased methionine versus 15 kg ha−1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
methioninee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.96 g/100 g Ne0
Comparator
sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1 significantly increased the plant height (44.6 cm), primary branches (5.18), effective pods plant−1(27.8), grains pods−1(11.0), 1000 grain wt. (35.7g), grain and stover yield (12.0 and 28.1 q ha−1), nitrogen uptake (86.05 kg ha−1), phosphorus uptake (10.06 kg ha−1), sulphur uptake (7.71 kg ha−1) and quality parameters like protein (24.56%) and methionine (5.96 g/100 g N) in comparison to sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 15 kg S ha1 decreased PSB population.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 15 kg S ha1e0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
PSB populatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of sulphur @ 15 kg S ha1 significantly and linearly decreased the PSB population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not significantly affect actinomycetes population.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
the treatmentse0
Outcome
Actinomycetes populatione0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Actinomycetes population was not significantly affected by the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application showed a diminishing trend in actinomycetes population.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
sulfur applicatione0
Outcome
population of actinomycetese0
Direction
diminishing trende0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulfur application showed a diminishing trend in the population of actinomycetes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium and PSB co-inoculation gave a better response across measured parameters.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
all the parameterse0
Direction
better responsee0
Comparator
Rhizobium and PSB inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium and PSB inoculation also showed significant response to all the parameters and showed better response when co-inoculated (Rhizobium + PSB).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1231 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur up to 15 kg S ha 1 increased total bacterial population.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
15 kg S ha 1e0
Outcome
total bacterial populatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
41.7 x 106 g1 soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total bacterial population (41.7 x 106 g1 soil), Rhizobium like organism (RLO) population (13.9 x 103 g1 soil) and Azotobacter population (12 x 103 g 1 soil) significantly increased up to the level of 15 kg S ha 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1454 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur up to 15 kg S ha 1 increased Rhizobium like organism (RLO) population.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
15 kg S ha 1e0
Outcome
Rhizobium like organism (RLO) populatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.9 x 103 g1 soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total bacterial population (41.7 x 106 g1 soil), Rhizobium like organism (RLO) population (13.9 x 103 g1 soil) and Azotobacter population (12 x 103 g 1 soil) significantly increased up to the level of 15 kg S ha 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1454 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur up to 15 kg S ha 1 increased Azotobacter population.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
15 kg S ha 1e0
Outcome
Azotobacter populatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12 x 103 g 1 soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total bacterial population (41.7 x 106 g1 soil), Rhizobium like organism (RLO) population (13.9 x 103 g1 soil) and Azotobacter population (12 x 103 g 1 soil) significantly increased up to the level of 15 kg S ha 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1454 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfur atom · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sulfur atom · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

36 papers: 36 positive, 0 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.