Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sulphur at 30 kg ha−1 increased nitrogen uptake versus 15 kg ha−1.

A claim from Nutrient management in mung bean (Vigna radiatal.) through sulphur and biofertilizers · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 30 kg ha−1 increased nitrogen uptake versus 15 kg ha−1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
86.05 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulphur @ 30 kg ha−1 significantly increased the plant height (44.6 cm), primary branches (5.18), effective pods plant−1(27.8), grains pods−1(11.0), 1000 grain wt. (35.7g), grain and stover yield (12.0 and 28.1 q ha−1), nitrogen uptake (86.05 kg ha−1), phosphorus uptake (10.06 kg ha−1), sulphur uptake (7.71 kg ha−1) and quality parameters like protein (24.56%) and methionine (5.96 g/100 g N) in comparison to sulphur @ 15 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–819
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32

Title

Nutrient management in mung bean (Vigna radiatal.) through sulphur and biofertilizers

Lal Bahadur; D.D. Tiwari Legume Research - An International Journal 2014. doi:10.5958/j.0976-0571.37.2.027

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-afe268ef655fca747b3b2b073c8368554c0934ff09bc693480479cd43ae153d0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.