Paper · 2008 · Progressive Agriculture

Studies on Genetic Variability Induced by Gamma-Rays in M2 Population of Mung Bean (Vigna Radiate L. Wilazek.)

Sushil Kumar; Anil Sirohi; Mamta Pal; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out on mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilazek) to asses the amount of genetic variability induced by 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 KR doses of gamma-rays in M2 generation. The characters, viz, number of pods per plant, no. of seed per pods, 100 seeds weight and yield per plant were studied. The analysis was made treatment wise for each character. Medium doses of gamma rays (30KR, 20KR) under dry treatment and higher does (40KR, 50KR) under soaked, treatment were found more effective to induced genetic variability for grain yield and its attributing characters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In mung bean, medium gamma-ray doses (30KR, 20KR) under dry treatment were more effective at inducing genetic variability for grain yield and its attributing characters.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
Medium doses of gamma rays (30KR, 20KR) under dry treatmente1
Outcome
genetic variability for grain yield and its attributing characterse1
Direction
more effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carried out on mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“Medium doses of gamma rays (30KR, 20KR) under dry treatment and higher does (40KR, 50KR) under soaked, treatment were found more effective to induced genetic variability for grain yield and its attributing characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In mung bean, higher gamma-ray doses (40KR, 50KR) under soaked treatment were more effective at inducing genetic variability for grain yield and its attributing characters.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
higher does (40KR, 50KR) under soaked, treatmente1
Outcome
genetic variability for grain yield and its attributing characterse1
Direction
more effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carried out on mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“Medium doses of gamma rays (30KR, 20KR) under dry treatment and higher does (40KR, 50KR) under soaked, treatment were found more effective to induced genetic variability for grain yield and its attributing characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–592 · show in text ↑

radiation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

in vitro · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.