Paper · 1981 · Indian Journal Of Nematology

Efficacy of nematicides for field control of nematodes infesting certain vegetable crops

M. Mashkoor Alam; Abrar M. Khan; Swati Saxena

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Efficacy of nematicides viz., DD, 1, 3-D, DBCP, Phorate, Fensulfothion and Dime-thoate was tested against some important genera of plant parasitic nematodes. All these nematicides significantly suppressed populations of all the nematodes to varying degrees around roots of tomato, eggplant, chilli, okra, cabbage, cauliflower and table beet. Fensulfothion proved to be most effective in reducing the population of nematodes around table beet and cabbage while DBCP was most successful in tomato and cauliflower and DD in eggplant, chilli and okra. Beneficial effects of these nematicides were evident by manifold increase in the yield or plant growth. DD gave best results with respect to the plant growth/yield in tomato, eggplant, chilli, okra and table beet, Fensulfothion in cabbage and Phorate in cauliflower.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested nematicides significantly suppressed populations of all nematodes to varying degrees around the roots of tomato, eggplant, chilli, okra, cabbage, cauliflower and table beet.

Taxon
tomato, eggplant, chilli, okra, cabbage, cauliflower and table beete0
Treatment
All these nematicidese0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pest
Outcome
populations of all the nematodese0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All these nematicides significantly suppressed populations of all the nematodes to varying degrees around roots of tomato, eggplant, chilli, okra, cabbage, cauliflower and table beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fensulfothion was most effective in reducing nematode populations around table beet and cabbage.

Treatment
Fensulfothione0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pest
Outcome
population of nematodese0
Direction
most effective in reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fensulfothion proved to be most effective in reducing the population of nematodes around table beet and cabbage while DBCP was most successful in tomato and cauliflower and DD in eggplant, chilli and okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DBCP was the most successful nematicide against nematode populations in tomato and cauliflower.

Treatment
DBCPe0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pest
Outcome
population of nematodese0
Direction
most successfule0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fensulfothion proved to be most effective in reducing the population of nematodes around table beet and cabbage while DBCP was most successful in tomato and cauliflower and DD in eggplant, chilli and okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DD was the most successful nematicide against nematode populations in eggplant, chilli and okra.

Taxon
eggplant, chilli and okrae0
Treatment
DDe0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pest
Outcome
population of nematodese0
Direction
most successfule0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fensulfothion proved to be most effective in reducing the population of nematodes around table beet and cabbage while DBCP was most successful in tomato and cauliflower and DD in eggplant, chilli and okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nematicides had beneficial effects evident as a manifold increase in yield or plant growth.

Treatment
these nematicidese0
Outcome
the yield or plant growthe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Beneficial effects of these nematicides were evident by manifold increase in the yield or plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DD gave the best plant growth and yield in tomato, eggplant, chilli, okra and table beet.

Taxon
tomato, eggplant, chilli, okra and table beete0
Treatment
DDe0
Outcome
plant growth/yielde0
Direction
best resultse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“DD gave best results with respect to the plant growth/yield in tomato, eggplant, chilli, okra and table beet, Fensulfothion in cabbage and Phorate in cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fensulfothion gave the best plant growth and yield in cabbage.

Treatment
Fensulfothione0
Outcome
plant growth/yielde0
Direction
best resultse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DD gave best results with respect to the plant growth/yield in tomato, eggplant, chilli, okra and table beet, Fensulfothion in cabbage and Phorate in cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phorate gave the best plant growth and yield in cauliflower.

Treatment
Phoratee0
Outcome
plant growth/yielde0
Direction
best resultse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DD gave best results with respect to the plant growth/yield in tomato, eggplant, chilli, okra and table beet, Fensulfothion in cabbage and Phorate in cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–813 · show in text ↑

fensulfothion · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane · Nematoda · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.