Abstract
Field experiments were carried out at the Horticultural Experiment Station, Bangalore, India, during 2004-2006, to study the response of mango to irrigation and fertigation levels. Fruit number and fruit yields were higher with 50% Evaporation Replenishment rate (ER) as compared to 25% ER. The yield differences between 100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizer (RDF) and 75% RDF were not significant. The response surface models fitted to the yield data indicated an optimum ER of 42% and RDF of 62%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Mango fruit number was higher at 50% than 25% evaporation replenishment.
- Taxon
- mango
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicae1 - Treatment
- 50% Evaporation Replenishment rate (ER)e0
- Outcome
- Fruit numbere0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 25% ERe0
- Setting
- Bangalore, Indiae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Fruit number and fruit yields were higher with 50% Evaporation Replenishment rate (ER) as compared to 25% ER.”
e1“mango”
e2“Bangalore, India”
Claim · model-written summary
Mango fruit yield was higher at 50% than 25% evaporation replenishment.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae1
- Treatment
- 50% Evaporation Replenishment rate (ER)e0
- Outcome
- fruit yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 25% ERe0
- Setting
- Bangalore, Indiae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fruit number and fruit yields were higher with 50% Evaporation Replenishment rate (ER) as compared to 25% ER.”
e1“mango”
e2“Bangalore, India”
Claim · model-written summary
Mango yield did not differ significantly between 100% and 75% recommended fertilizer dose.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae1
- Treatment
- 100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizer (RDF)e0
- Outcome
- yield differencese0
- Comparator
- 75% RDFe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield differences between 100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizer (RDF) and 75% RDF were not significant.”
e1“mango”
Claim · model-written summary
Response surface models estimated optimum evaporation replenishment at 42%.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae1
- Outcome
- optimum ERe0
- Direction
- optimume0
- Value
- 42%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The response surface models fitted to the yield data indicated an optimum ER of 42% and RDF of 62%.”
e1“mango”
Claim · model-written summary
Response surface models estimated optimum recommended fertilizer dose at 62%.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae1
- Outcome
- RDFe0
- Direction
- optimume0
- Value
- 62%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The response surface models fitted to the yield data indicated an optimum ER of 42% and RDF of 62%.”
e1“mango”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 59 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.