Paper · 2014 · Trends in Biosciences/Trends in biosciences

Productivity and Profitability of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Influenced by Various Transplanting Dates and Mulches

Sanket J. More; J. H. Gohil; D. R. Bhanderi; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted to access the effect of transplanting dates and mulching on yield of tomato and nutrient status of soil. Among different dates of planting (5th November) recorded highest vegetative growth, yield attributes and total fruit yield; whereas it was vice-versa in case of 15th December planting. Among different mulch materials, black polythene showed significant effect on vegetative growth, yield and yield attributes. Marketable fruit yield (44.21 t/ha) was significantly higher in black polythene mulch compared to other mulch materials. Further, Nutrient status of soil after the harvest of crop was remarkably influenced. Higher values of available N (335 kg ha−1), P2O5(69 kg ha−1), K2O (353 kg ha−1) were noticed under the treatment of D1M1 (5th November and black polythene mulch). Further, the conjoint application of 5th November and black polythene mulch recorded the higher benefit: cost ratio of 2.05: 1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

November 5 transplanting produced the highest vegetative growth, yield attributes and total fruit yield.

Treatment
5th Novembere0
Outcome
vegetative growth, yield attributes and total fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
different dates of plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among different dates of planting (5th November) recorded highest vegetative growth, yield attributes and total fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

December 15 planting gave the opposite, lowest growth and yield pattern.

Treatment
15th December plantinge0
Outcome
vegetative growth, yield attributes and total fruit yielde0
Direction
vice-versae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among different dates of planting (5th November) recorded highest vegetative growth, yield attributes and total fruit yield; whereas it was vice-versa in case of 15th December planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polythene significantly affected tomato vegetative growth, yield and yield attributes.

Treatment
black polythenee0
Outcome
vegetative growth, yield and yield attributese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“black polythene showed significant effect on vegetative growth, yield and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polythene yielded 44.21 t/ha marketable fruit, significantly above other mulches.

Treatment
black polythene mulche0
Outcome
Marketable fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
44.21 t/hae0
Comparator
other mulch materialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Marketable fruit yield (44.21 t/ha) was significantly higher in black polythene mulch compared to other mulch materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–563 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

November 5 planting with black polythene had higher available soil N at 335 kg ha−1.

Treatment
D1M1 (5th November and black polythene mulch)e0
Outcome
available Ne0
Direction
Highere0
Value
335 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values of available N (335 kg ha−1), P2O5(69 kg ha−1), K2O (353 kg ha−1) were noticed under the treatment of D1M1 (5th November and black polythene mulch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

November 5 planting with black polythene had higher available soil P2O5 at 69 kg ha−1.

Treatment
D1M1 (5th November and black polythene mulch)e0
Outcome
P2O5e0
Direction
Highere0
Value
69 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values of available N (335 kg ha−1), P2O5(69 kg ha−1), K2O (353 kg ha−1) were noticed under the treatment of D1M1 (5th November and black polythene mulch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

November 5 planting with black polythene had higher available soil K2O at 353 kg ha−1.

Treatment
D1M1 (5th November and black polythene mulch)e0
Outcome
K2Oe0
Direction
Highere0
Value
353 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values of available N (335 kg ha−1), P2O5(69 kg ha−1), K2O (353 kg ha−1) were noticed under the treatment of D1M1 (5th November and black polythene mulch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined November 5 and black polythene treatment gave a higher benefit:cost ratio of 2.05:1.

Treatment
5th November and black polythene mulche0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.05: 1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the conjoint application of 5th November and black polythene mulch recorded the higher benefit: cost ratio of 2.05: 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene) · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

poly(ethylene) · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

mulching · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mulching · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 44 positive, 11 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

mulching · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 184 positive, 26 negative or no effect

183 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

206 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.