Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Weed dynamics, yield and economics in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) pulses intercropping system under rainfed condition

M.N. BUDHAR; N.TAMILSELVAN

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in red sandy loam soils during the rainy season 2000 and 2001 at Regional Research Station, Paiyur, to study weed dynamics, yield and economics in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] pulses intercropping system under rainfed condition. The treatments consisted of recommended practice of sorghum (pure crop) with atrazine 0.25 kg a.i./ha and sorghum intercropped with cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.], blackgram (Phaseolus mungo L.), and greengram (F radiatus L.) without and with pre emergence her bicide metolachlor 1.0 kg a.i./ha. Application of atrazine 0.25 kg a.i./ha in pure crop of sorghum and metolachlor 1.0 kg a.i./ha in intercropping system controlled the weeds effectively compared to no herbicide application. Ap plication of metolachlor increased the mean sorghum grain yield by 54, 48 and 47% and pulses grain yield by 4 , 38 and 27% in sorghum cowpea, sorgtium blackgram and sorghum greengram intercropping, respectively, com pared to no herbicide application. The higher net income (Rs 10,759) and benefit : cost ratio (3.1 6) were recorded in sorghum greengram with metolachlor application than other intercropping system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine in pure sorghum controlled weeds relative to no herbicide.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
atrazine 0.25 kg a.i./hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
controllede0
Comparator
no herbicide applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of atrazine 0.25 kg a.i./ha in pure crop of sorghum and metolachlor 1.0 kg a.i./ha in intercropping system controlled the weeds effectively compared to no herbicide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–763 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metolachlor in intercropped sorghum controlled weeds relative to no herbicide.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
metolachlor 1.0 kg a.i./hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
controllede0
Comparator
no herbicide applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of atrazine 0.25 kg a.i./ha in pure crop of sorghum and metolachlor 1.0 kg a.i./ha in intercropping system controlled the weeds effectively compared to no herbicide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–763 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metolachlor raised mean sorghum grain yield 54% in sorghum cowpea intercropping.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
metolachlore0
Outcome
mean sorghum grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
54e0
Qualifier
sorghum cowpeae0
Comparator
no herbicide applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ap plication of metolachlor increased the mean sorghum grain yield by 54, 48 and 47% and pulses grain yield by 4 , 38 and 27% in sorghum cowpea, sorgtium blackgram and sorghum greengram intercropping, respectively, com pared to no herbicide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metolachlor raised sorghum grain yield 48% in sorghum blackgram intercropping.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
metolachlore0
Outcome
mean sorghum grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
48e0
Qualifier
sorgtium blackgrame0
Comparator
no herbicide applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ap plication of metolachlor increased the mean sorghum grain yield by 54, 48 and 47% and pulses grain yield by 4 , 38 and 27% in sorghum cowpea, sorgtium blackgram and sorghum greengram intercropping, respectively, com pared to no herbicide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metolachlor raised sorghum grain yield 47% in sorghum greengram intercropping.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
metolachlore0
Outcome
mean sorghum grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
47%e0
Qualifier
sorghum greengrame0
Comparator
no herbicide applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ap plication of metolachlor increased the mean sorghum grain yield by 54, 48 and 47% and pulses grain yield by 4 , 38 and 27% in sorghum cowpea, sorgtium blackgram and sorghum greengram intercropping, respectively, com pared to no herbicide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metolachlor raised pulse grain yield 4% in sorghum cowpea intercropping.

Treatment
metolachlore0
Outcome
pulses grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4e0
Qualifier
sorghum cowpeae0
Comparator
no herbicide applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ap plication of metolachlor increased the mean sorghum grain yield by 54, 48 and 47% and pulses grain yield by 4 , 38 and 27% in sorghum cowpea, sorgtium blackgram and sorghum greengram intercropping, respectively, com pared to no herbicide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–1017 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metolachlor raised pulse grain yield 38% in sorghum blackgram intercropping.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe1
Treatment
metolachlore0
Outcome
pulses grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
38e0
Qualifier
sorgtium blackgrame0
Comparator
no herbicide applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ap plication of metolachlor increased the mean sorghum grain yield by 54, 48 and 47% and pulses grain yield by 4 , 38 and 27% in sorghum cowpea, sorgtium blackgram and sorghum greengram intercropping, respectively, com pared to no herbicide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–1017 · show in text ↑
e1

“blackgram (Phaseolus mungo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metolachlor raised pulse grain yield 27% in sorghum greengram intercropping.

Treatment
metolachlore0
Outcome
pulses grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27%e0
Qualifier
sorghum greengrame0
Comparator
no herbicide applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ap plication of metolachlor increased the mean sorghum grain yield by 54, 48 and 47% and pulses grain yield by 4 , 38 and 27% in sorghum cowpea, sorgtium blackgram and sorghum greengram intercropping, respectively, com pared to no herbicide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–1017 · show in text ↑
e1

“greengram (F radiatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–503 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum greengram with metolachlor had the highest net income, Rs 10,759.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
metolachlor applicatione0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs 10,759e0
Comparator
other intercropping systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher net income (Rs 10,759) and benefit : cost ratio (3.1 6) were recorded in sorghum greengram with metolachlor application than other intercropping system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1181 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum greengram with metolachlor had the highest benefit to cost ratio, 3.1 6.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
metolachlor applicatione0
Outcome
benefit : cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.1 6e0
Comparator
other intercropping systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher net income (Rs 10,759) and benefit : cost ratio (3.1 6) were recorded in sorghum greengram with metolachlor application than other intercropping system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1181 · show in text ↑

metolachlor · yield · SorghumResults differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

metolachlor · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

metolachlor · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

metolachlor · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

metolachlor · weed · SorghumResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

atrazine · weed · SorghumResults agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.