Paper · 2014

Productivity and Profitability of Autumn Sugarcane and Brassica Crops based Intercropping Systems

Navneet Kaur; Makhan Singh Bhullar

13
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The study evaluates the performance of autumn sugarcane and Brassica based intercropping systems with different weed management treatments. Experiment consisted of three cropping systems and six weed control treatments. The cane yield under gobhisarson and raya intercropped sugarcane were similar to that of sole sugarcane; whereas the cane equivalent yield, net profit and benefit cost ratio under the intercropping systems were observed to be higher than sole sugarcane. The intercropping of raya and gobhi-sarson in autumn sugarcane increased the net returns as compared to sole sugarcane crop by 73 and 32 per. cent, respectively. Application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg and alachlor 1.875 kg/haresulted in effective control of weeds in these intercropping systems and had the highest cane equivalent yield (100.4 t/ha), which was higher than weedy check (93.3 t/ha) and similar to that in both rates of alachlor and hand weeding. Pendimethalin 0.75 kg and alachlor 1.875 kg/ha had higher net returns and B-C ratio than the conventional practice of hand weeding and weedy check. Averaged over two years, the use of herbicides Increased the net returns by Rs 1775 to Rs 16,409/ha as campared to the weedy check.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane yield with gobhisarson intercropping was similar to sole sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
gobhisarsone0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
sole sugarcanee0

Verbatim

e0

“The cane yield under gobhisarson and raya intercropped sugarcane were similar to that of sole sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane yield with raya intercropping was similar to sole sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
rayae0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
sole sugarcanee0

Verbatim

e0

“The cane yield under gobhisarson and raya intercropped sugarcane were similar to that of sole sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased cane equivalent yield against sole sugarcane.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Outcome
cane equivalent yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole sugarcanee0

Verbatim

e0

“the cane equivalent yield, net profit and benefit cost ratio under the intercropping systems were observed to be higher than sole sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased net profit against sole sugarcane.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Outcome
net profite0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole sugarcanee0

Verbatim

e0

“the cane equivalent yield, net profit and benefit cost ratio under the intercropping systems were observed to be higher than sole sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased benefit cost ratio against sole sugarcane.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole sugarcanee0

Verbatim

e0

“the cane equivalent yield, net profit and benefit cost ratio under the intercropping systems were observed to be higher than sole sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raya intercropping increased sugarcane net returns by 73 per. cent over sole sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
rayae0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
73 and 32 per. cente0
Comparator
sole sugarcane crope0

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropping of raya and gobhi-sarson in autumn sugarcane increased the net returns as compared to sole sugarcane crop by 73 and 32 per. cent, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gobhi-sarson intercropping increased sugarcane net returns by 32 per. cent over sole sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
gobhi-sarsone0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
32 per. cente0
Comparator
sole sugarcane crope0

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropping of raya and gobhi-sarson in autumn sugarcane increased the net returns as compared to sole sugarcane crop by 73 and 32 per. cent, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin at 0.75 kg effectively controlled weeds in the intercropping systems.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.75 kge0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
control of weedse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg and alachlor 1.875 kg/haresulted in effective control of weeds in these intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alachlor at 1.875 kg/ha effectively controlled weeds in the intercropping systems.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
alachlor 1.875 kg/hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
control of weedse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg and alachlor 1.875 kg/haresulted in effective control of weeds in these intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed control treatment achieved the highest cane equivalent yield of 100.4 t/ha versus 93.3 t/ha for the weedy check.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
cane equivalent yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
100.4 t/hae0
Qualifier
93.3 t/hae0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“highest cane equivalent yield (100.4 t/ha), which was higher than weedy check (93.3 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin and alachlor treatments had higher net returns than hand weeding and weedy check.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Pendimethalin 0.75 kg and alachlor 1.875 kg/hae0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
hand weeding and weedy checke0

Verbatim

e0

“Pendimethalin 0.75 kg and alachlor 1.875 kg/ha had higher net returns and B-C ratio than the conventional practice of hand weeding and weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin and alachlor treatments had higher benefit cost ratios than hand weeding and weedy check.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Pendimethalin 0.75 kg and alachlor 1.875 kg/hae0
Outcome
B-C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
hand weeding and weedy checke0

Verbatim

e0

“Pendimethalin 0.75 kg and alachlor 1.875 kg/ha had higher net returns and B-C ratio than the conventional practice of hand weeding and weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides increased net returns by Rs 1775 to Rs 16,409/ha relative to the weedy check over two years.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
herbicidese0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
Increasede0
Value
Rs 1775 to Rs 16,409/hae0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Verbatim

e0

“the use of herbicides Increased the net returns by Rs 1775 to Rs 16,409/ha as campared to the weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

alachlor · weed · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

alachlor · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
    The integrated treatment increased cane yield by 91% over the farmers method.

    Studies on integration of tillage and herbicides for weed control in sugarcane · 2002 · compared with farmers method of three disc harrowings and hand weeding twice at 30 and 60 DAP

    Same direction

See all 2 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

herbicide · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

51 papers: 37 positive, 14 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

88 papers: 67 positive, 21 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.