Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Breeder Seed Production farm of Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, during the rainy ( kharif) seasons of 2011 and 2012, to find out most efficient and economic combination of different organic and inorganic sources of nutrients to increase the productivity of hybrid maize ( Zea mays L.) with- out deteriorating the soil qualities. Integrated application of 25% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with biofertilizers ( Azotobacter chroococcum + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria), green-manuring with sunhemp ( Crotalaria juncea L.) and incorporation of compost @ 10 tonnes/ha improved soil physico-chemical properties, viz. pH, bulk density and infiltration rate, and the nutrient status of soil in respect of organic carbon, available N and available P. Maize grain yield was increased by 252.38% over the control and 147.62% over application of 100% RDF with combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizers, which was 7.4 tonnes/ha with highest gross re- turns ( 95.9 103/ha) and net returns ( 54.2 103/ha). Maximum benefit: cost ratio (1.30) was also observed in combined use of 25% RDF, compost, biofertilizers and green manuring and it was followed by application of 100% RDF (1.26), which was responsible for deterioration of nutrient status of soil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated fertilizer, biofertilizer, sunhemp and compost application improved soil physical and chemical properties.
- Treatment
- Integrated application of 25% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with biofertilizers ( Azotobacter chroococcum + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria), green-manuring with sunhemp ( Crotalaria juncea L.) and incorporation of compost @ 10 tonnes/hae0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume0symbiont
- Outcome
- soil physico-chemical properties, viz. pH, bulk density and infiltration ratee0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e0“Integrated application of 25% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with biofertilizers ( Azotobacter chroococcum + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria), green-manuring with sunhemp ( Crotalaria juncea L.) and incorporation of compost @ 10 tonnes/ha improved soil physico-chemical properties, viz. pH, bulk density and infiltration rate”
Claim · model-written summary
The integrated treatment improved soil organic carbon and available N and P.
- Outcome
- nutrient status of soil in respect of organic carbon, available N and available Pe0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e0“and the nutrient status of soil in respect of organic carbon, available N and available P”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined organic and inorganic fertilizers increased maize grain yield by 252.38% over control.
- Treatment
- combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- Maize grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 252.38%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e0“Maize grain yield was increased by 252.38% over the control and 147.62% over application of 100% RDF with combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizers”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined organic and inorganic fertilizers increased maize grain yield by 147.62% over 100% RDF.
- Treatment
- combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- Maize grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 147.62%e0
- Comparator
- application of 100% RDFe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e0“Maize grain yield was increased by 252.38% over the control and 147.62% over application of 100% RDF with combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizers”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment yielded 7.4 tonnes/ha.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e0“which was 7.4 tonnes/ha with highest gross re- turns ( 95.9 103/ha) and net returns ( 54.2 103/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment had the highest gross returns of 95.9 103/ha.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e0“highest gross re- turns ( 95.9 103/ha) and net returns ( 54.2 103/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment had the highest net returns of 54.2 103/ha.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e0“highest gross re- turns ( 95.9 103/ha) and net returns ( 54.2 103/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment had the maximum benefit:cost ratio of 1.30.
- Treatment
- combined use of 25% RDF, compost, biofertilizers and green manuringe0
- Outcome
- benefit: cost ratioe0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 1.30e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e0“Maximum benefit: cost ratio (1.30) was also observed in combined use of 25% RDF, compost, biofertilizers and green manuring”
Claim · model-written summary
The 100% RDF treatment had a benefit:cost ratio of 1.26.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e0“followed by application of 100% RDF (1.26), which was responsible for deterioration of nutrient status of soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 100% RDF deteriorated soil nutrient status.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e0“application of 100% RDF (1.26), which was responsible for deterioration of nutrient status of soil”
The same questions in other papers
Crotalaria juncea · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
phosphorus · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →inoculation · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
67 papers more in this group
See all 71 papers →fertilization · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
302 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
335 papers more in this group
See all 339 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,026 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,160 papers more in this group
See all 1,164 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.