Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Influence of different organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on maize (Zea mays)

ANIKET KALHAPURE; BALASAHEB SHETE; MADHUKAR DHONDE; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Breeder Seed Production farm of Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, during the rainy ( kharif) seasons of 2011 and 2012, to find out most efficient and economic combination of different organic and inorganic sources of nutrients to increase the productivity of hybrid maize ( Zea mays L.) with- out deteriorating the soil qualities. Integrated application of 25% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with biofertilizers ( Azotobacter chroococcum + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria), green-manuring with sunhemp ( Crotalaria juncea L.) and incorporation of compost @ 10 tonnes/ha improved soil physico-chemical properties, viz. pH, bulk density and infiltration rate, and the nutrient status of soil in respect of organic carbon, available N and available P. Maize grain yield was increased by 252.38% over the control and 147.62% over application of 100% RDF with combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizers, which was 7.4 tonnes/ha with highest gross re- turns ( 95.9 103/ha) and net returns ( 54.2 103/ha). Maximum benefit: cost ratio (1.30) was also observed in combined use of 25% RDF, compost, biofertilizers and green manuring and it was followed by application of 100% RDF (1.26), which was responsible for deterioration of nutrient status of soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated fertilizer, biofertilizer, sunhemp and compost application improved soil physical and chemical properties.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Integrated application of 25% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with biofertilizers ( Azotobacter chroococcum + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria), green-manuring with sunhemp ( Crotalaria juncea L.) and incorporation of compost @ 10 tonnes/hae0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume0symbiont
Outcome
soil physico-chemical properties, viz. pH, bulk density and infiltration ratee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Integrated application of 25% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with biofertilizers ( Azotobacter chroococcum + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria), green-manuring with sunhemp ( Crotalaria juncea L.) and incorporation of compost @ 10 tonnes/ha improved soil physico-chemical properties, viz. pH, bulk density and infiltration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated treatment improved soil organic carbon and available N and P.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
nutrient status of soil in respect of organic carbon, available N and available Pe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“and the nutrient status of soil in respect of organic carbon, available N and available P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined organic and inorganic fertilizers increased maize grain yield by 252.38% over control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
Maize grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
252.38%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maize grain yield was increased by 252.38% over the control and 147.62% over application of 100% RDF with combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined organic and inorganic fertilizers increased maize grain yield by 147.62% over 100% RDF.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
Maize grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
147.62%e0
Comparator
application of 100% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maize grain yield was increased by 252.38% over the control and 147.62% over application of 100% RDF with combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–954 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment yielded 7.4 tonnes/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
7.4 tonnes/hae0
Value
7.4 tonnes/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“which was 7.4 tonnes/ha with highest gross re- turns ( 95.9 103/ha) and net returns ( 54.2 103/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1054 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment had the highest gross returns of 95.9 103/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
gross re- turnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
95.9 103/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest gross re- turns ( 95.9 103/ha) and net returns ( 54.2 103/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1054 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment had the highest net returns of 54.2 103/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
54.2 103/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest gross re- turns ( 95.9 103/ha) and net returns ( 54.2 103/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1054 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment had the maximum benefit:cost ratio of 1.30.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
combined use of 25% RDF, compost, biofertilizers and green manuringe0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
1.30e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum benefit: cost ratio (1.30) was also observed in combined use of 25% RDF, compost, biofertilizers and green manuring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF treatment had a benefit:cost ratio of 1.26.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
application of 100% RDFe0
Outcome
application of 100% RDFe0
Value
1.26e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“followed by application of 100% RDF (1.26), which was responsible for deterioration of nutrient status of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 100% RDF deteriorated soil nutrient status.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
application of 100% RDFe0
Outcome
nutrient status of soile0
Direction
deterioratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of 100% RDF (1.26), which was responsible for deterioration of nutrient status of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1301 · show in text ↑

Crotalaria juncea · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 33 positive, 5 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 62 positive, 9 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

339 papers: 303 positive, 36 negative or no effect

302 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

335 papers more in this group

See all 339 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,026 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.