Paper · 2015 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Impact of climate change on wheat productivity in Ludhiana and Bathinda of Punjab

K.K. Gill; Ritu Babuta; G.S. Buttar; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Climate is changing world over and is expected to continue to do so in future also and has potential impact on crop productivity. Punjab has a distinct sub-tropical climate with most rainfall occurring during summer mansoon. The main factors limiting wheat production in this region are rainfall and temperature. To investigate the weather variability impacts on wheat productivity in Ludhiana and Bathinda of Punjab, the present investigation was undertaken at Ludhiana and Bathinda with three dates of sowing i.e. 30th Oct. (D1), 15th Nov. (D2) and 30th Nov.(D3) and the three irrigation levels i.e. I1 (recommended schedule), I2 (one additional irrigation, after CRI stage) and I3 (delayed irrigation by one week after heading). Two wheat cultivars viz. PBW 343 (V1) and WH 542 (V2) were also taken for studies and experiments were conducted during 2008–09 and 2009–10. A drastic decline in yield was observed during 2009–10 as compared to 2008–09 at both the locations. The crop sown on 30th Oct. and 15th Nov. gave better yield than the crop sown on 30th Nov. The reduction in yield was more during 2009–10 at Bathinda as compared to Ludhiana. The analysis showed no significant effect in different irrigation schedules under three dates of sowing. Cultivar PBW 343 performed better than WH 542 during both the years under study and application of one additional irrigation after CRI stage increased grain yield over recommended irrigation schedule.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield declined sharply in 2009–10 relative to 2008–09 at both locations.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
drastic declinee0
Comparator
2008–09e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“A drastic decline in yield was observed during 2009–10 as compared to 2008–09 at both the locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat sown on 30th Oct. yielded better than wheat sown on 30th Nov.

Treatment
30th Oct.e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
30th Nov.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“The crop sown on 30th Oct. and 15th Nov. gave better yield than the crop sown on 30th Nov.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat sown on 15th Nov. yielded better than wheat sown on 30th Nov.

Treatment
15th Nov.e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
30th Nov.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“The crop sown on 30th Oct. and 15th Nov. gave better yield than the crop sown on 30th Nov.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1064 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year-to-year wheat yield reduction was greater at Bathinda than Ludhiana.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
Ludhianae0
Setting
Bathindae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“The reduction in yield was more during 2009–10 at Bathinda as compared to Ludhiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation schedules had no significant effect under the three sowing dates.

Treatment
different irrigation schedulese0
Outcome
effecte0
Qualifier
under three dates of sowinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“no significant effect in different irrigation schedules under three dates of sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBW 343 performed better than WH 542 in both study years.

Material
PBW 343e0
Treatment
PBW 343e0
Outcome
performed bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
WH 542e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cultivar PBW 343 performed better than WH 542 during both the years under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One additional irrigation after CRI stage increased grain yield over the recommended schedule.

Treatment
one additional irrigation after CRI stagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
recommended irrigation schedulee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of one additional irrigation after CRI stage increased grain yield over recommended irrigation schedule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1453 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.