Paper · 2013 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Efficacy of chemical and plant products in management of Earias vittella Fab. on Okra

Khan Aziz Sahak; Hemant Lyall

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Among insecticides, cypermethrin 25% EC @ 0.0625%, chlorpyriphos 20% EC @ 0.04% and profenofos 50% EC @ 0.04% concentration were found to be most effective, the fruit damage percentage was 4.2, 9.9 and 9.8%, respectively. The treatments with botanicals viz. garlic 30 g/liter water, neem oil 4 ml/liter and green chilli extract 10 g/liter water were also effective, resulting 7.8, 9.0 and 9.9% fruit damage, respectively, compared with control plot (21.4%). garlic 30 g/liter water was therefore, found best botanical treatment against E. vittella.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cypermethrin 25% EC at 0.0625% produced 4.2% okra fruit damage.

Treatment
cypermethrin 25% EC @ 0.0625%e0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Outcome
fruit damage percentagee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
4.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cypermethrin 25% EC @ 0.0625%, chlorpyriphos 20% EC @ 0.04% and profenofos 50% EC @ 0.04% concentration were found to be most effective, the fruit damage percentage was 4.2, 9.9 and 9.8%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella Fab. on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyriphos 20% EC at 0.04% produced 9.9% okra fruit damage.

Treatment
chlorpyriphos 20% EC @ 0.04%e0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Outcome
fruit damage percentagee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
9.9e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorpyriphos 20% EC @ 0.04% and profenofos 50% EC @ 0.04% concentration were found to be most effective, the fruit damage percentage was 4.2, 9.9 and 9.8%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella Fab. on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profenofos 50% EC at 0.04% produced 9.8% okra fruit damage.

Treatment
profenofos 50% EC @ 0.04%e0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Outcome
fruit damage percentagee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
9.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“profenofos 50% EC @ 0.04% concentration were found to be most effective, the fruit damage percentage was 4.2, 9.9 and 9.8%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella Fab. on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic at 30 g/liter water produced 7.8% okra fruit damage, compared with 21.4% in the control plot.

Treatment
garlic 30 g/liter watere0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
effectivee0
Value
7.8e0
Qualifier
21.4%e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“garlic 30 g/liter water, neem oil 4 ml/liter and green chilli extract 10 g/liter water were also effective, resulting 7.8, 9.0 and 9.9% fruit damage, respectively, compared with control plot (21.4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–457 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella Fab. on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil at 4 ml/liter produced 9.0% okra fruit damage, compared with 21.4% in the control plot.

Treatment
neem oil 4 ml/litere0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
effectivee0
Value
9.0e0
Qualifier
21.4%e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“garlic 30 g/liter water, neem oil 4 ml/liter and green chilli extract 10 g/liter water were also effective, resulting 7.8, 9.0 and 9.9% fruit damage, respectively, compared with control plot (21.4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–457 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella Fab. on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green chilli extract at 10 g/liter water produced 9.9% okra fruit damage, compared with 21.4% in the control plot.

Treatment
green chilli extract 10 g/liter watere0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
effectivee0
Value
9.9%e0
Qualifier
21.4%e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“garlic 30 g/liter water, neem oil 4 ml/liter and green chilli extract 10 g/liter water were also effective, resulting 7.8, 9.0 and 9.9% fruit damage, respectively, compared with control plot (21.4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–457 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella Fab. on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified garlic at 30 g/liter water as the best botanical treatment against E. vittella on okra.

Treatment
garlic 30 g/liter watere0
Interactor
E. vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
Outcome
best botanical treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“garlic 30 g/liter water was therefore, found best botanical treatment against E. vittella.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–548 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella Fab. on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑

profenofos · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Allium sativum · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chlorpyrifos · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cypermethrin · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

botanical · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.