Paper · 2015 · Crop Science

Maximum Attainable Wheat Yield and Resource‐Use Efficiency in the Southern Great Plains

Romulo P. Lollato; Jeffrey T. Edwards

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
103
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Maximum reported grain yields for hard red winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) in the southern Great Plains range from 6 to 8 Mg ha –1 and are significantly lower than yields achieved in other regions of the world. The lack of empirical data for wheat under nonlimiting conditions in this region, however, suggests that maximum reported grain yields for the region might not represent maximum attainable yields. Our objective was to perform the agronomic characterization of wheat grown under nonlimiting conditions across the southern Great Plains. Four dryland and two irrigated fields were sown to ‘Iba’ winter wheat in the 2012–2013 growing season and repeated during 2013–2014 in central Oklahoma. Fields were intensively managed for fertility for maximum yield and freedom from weeds, insects, and disease. Aboveground dry matter at maturity ranged from 9.95 to 20.5 Mg ha –1 , but harvest index (HI) did not surpass 0.41 and grain yields ranged from 3.06 to 7.68 Mg ha –1 . The highest yield was achieved under irrigated conditions in 2013–2014, but one dryland site produced 7.11 Mg ha –1 grain in 2012–2013. Maximum radiation‐use efficiency (RUE) ranged from 0.8 to 1.9 g MJ –1 and water‐use efficiency (WUE) from 7.8 to 12.6 kg ha –1 mm –1 . The wheat characteristics measured in this study were near or above maximum values reported in the literature for the region, and our data provide empirical evidence to support maximum attainable wheat yields of 7.68 Mg ha –1 when wheat is grown under nonlimiting conditions in the southern Great Plains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat aboveground dry matter at maturity ranged from 9.95 to 20.5 Mg ha –1.

Outcome
Aboveground dry matter at maturitye0
Value
9.95 to 20.5 Mg ha –1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aboveground dry matter at maturity ranged from 9.95 to 20.5 Mg ha –1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index did not surpass 0.41.

Outcome
harvest index (HI)e0
Direction
did not surpasse0
Value
0.41e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvest index (HI) did not surpass 0.41”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yields ranged from 3.06 to 7.68 Mg ha –1.

Outcome
grain yieldse0
Value
3.06 to 7.68 Mg ha –1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yields ranged from 3.06 to 7.68 Mg ha –1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest yield was under irrigation in 2013–2014.

Treatment
irrigated conditionse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
2013–2014e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield was achieved under irrigated conditions in 2013–2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One dryland site yielded 7.11 Mg ha –1 grain in 2012–2013.

Outcome
graine0
Value
7.11 Mg ha –1e0
Qualifier
2012–2013e0
Setting
dryland sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one dryland site produced 7.11 Mg ha –1 grain in 2012–2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum radiation-use efficiency ranged from 0.8 to 1.9 g MJ –1.

Outcome
radiation‐use efficiency (RUE)e0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
0.8 to 1.9 g MJ –1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum radiation‐use efficiency (RUE) ranged from 0.8 to 1.9 g MJ –1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-use efficiency ranged from 7.8 to 12.6 kg ha –1 mm –1.

Outcome
water‐use efficiency (WUE)e0
Value
7.8 to 12.6 kg ha –1 mm –1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water‐use efficiency (WUE) from 7.8 to 12.6 kg ha –1 mm –1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Measured wheat characteristics were near or above regional reported maxima.

Outcome
wheat characteristicse0
Direction
near or abovee0
Comparator
maximum values reported in the literature for the regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat characteristics measured in this study were near or above maximum values reported in the literature for the region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1386 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support 7.68 Mg ha –1 as attainable under nonlimiting conditions.

Outcome
maximum attainable wheat yieldse0
Value
7.68 Mg ha –1e0
Qualifier
nonlimiting conditionse0
Setting
southern Great Plainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum attainable wheat yields of 7.68 Mg ha –1 when wheat is grown under nonlimiting conditions in the southern Great Plains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1565 · show in text ↑